From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from maynard.mail.mindspring.net (maynard.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.243]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28EA15166 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:34:15 -0600 (CST) Received: from user-112umh0.biz.mindspring.com ([66.47.90.32] helo=offthehill.org) by maynard.mail.mindspring.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 168oun-0000wv-00 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:33:13 -0500 Received: (qmail 14371 invoked by uid 1000); 27 Nov 2001 20:27:42 -0000 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:27:42 -0500 From: Joshua Pollak To: gentoo-ebuild@gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20011127152742.A14364@atelier.offthehill.net> References: <1006817973.23206.0.camel@inspiron.theleaf.office> <0GNG00DA5ULHBX@mxout1.netvision.net.il> <20011127112204.B13783@atelier.offthehill.net> <0GNH00F6Q78Z2Z@mxout1.netvision.net.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0GNH00F6Q78Z2Z@mxout1.netvision.net.il> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-ebuild] Ebuild integration / ignoring Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Reply-To: josh@offthehill.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: c659b99f-f2da-4a6b-a4fa-d33487468d98 X-Archives-Hash: bd0114b6e0cf528bf24287189871b150 I was going to suggest PEST, unrecoverable.org. A new version just came out today, and the demo (unrecoverable.org/demo) looks pretty good. I'm not a member of gentoo-dev, but I'll subscribe right now. On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 10:23:29PM +0200, Dan Armak wrote: > Hi, > > This has been brought up before, and as I understand someone objected to > bugzilla, which was suggested by Hallski and others. We should make this a > discussion on gentoo-dev and get a general agreement and drobbins' approval > before actually doing anything. > > -- > > Dan Armak > Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team > Matan, Israel > _______________________________________________ > gentoo-ebuild mailing list > gentoo-ebuild@gentoo.org > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-ebuild