[gentoo-dev] Emerging python 2.1.X breaks portage

[gentoo-dev] Emerging python 2.1.X breaks portage

[Jon Nelson]

But it can be "fixed" (bandaid) by changing the first line of
/usr/bin/xpak
from
#! /usr/bin/python
to
#! /usr/bin/spython

For portage specific modules, shouldn't there be a specific directory that
is added to the sys.path at startup (of each program)?

Can spython be unmerged after python 2.1.X is merged?

Also, should spython be a virtual for python if it does not include
development files?  pygtk *requires* one of the sys-devel/python
to be installed -- spython won't do it, and pygtk uses virtual/python
in its depends.

What is the "right" thing to do here?

-- 
Pound for pound, the amoeba is the most vicious animal on earth.

Jon Nelson
jnelson@jamponi.net

Re: [gentoo-dev] Emerging python 2.1.X breaks portage

[Daniel Robbins]

On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 09:25:58PM -0600, Jon Nelson wrote:
> What is the "right" thing to do here?

The right thing to do is for me to release a new version of Portage,
which I will do immediately.

Best Regards,

-- 
Daniel Robbins                                  <drobbins@gentoo.org>
Chief Architect/President                       http://www.gentoo.org 
Gentoo Technologies, Inc.