From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,
	INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NO_RELAYS autolearn=no
	autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0
Received: from drobbins by cvs.gentoo.org with local (Exim 3.30 #1)
	id 15zkyw-0007Ah-00
	for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2001 13:32:02 -0700
From: Daniel Robbins <drobbins@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-3.0.2-based system
Message-ID: <20011102133202.S10619@cvs.gentoo.org>
References: <20011102143151.A13584@g2.ces.clemson.edu> <20011102150952.A13768@g2.ces.clemson.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20011102150952.A13768@g2.ces.clemson.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@cvs.gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@cvs.gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list <gentoo-dev.cvs.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@cvs.gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://cvs.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
Date: Fri Nov  2 13:33:02 2001
X-Original-Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 13:32:02 -0700
X-Archives-Salt: 1b26681a-b1d0-486b-a6a3-13907f393a09
X-Archives-Hash: 819740dbac727979a8584fa7f4914cb5

On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 03:09:52PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:

> I also found that netkit-telnetd-0.17 seems to be broken under 
> the latest gcc/glibc.  For some reason the older gcc/glibc
> combination managed to find exit(), memcpy(), and various
> string functions without <stdlib.h>, <memory.h>, and <string.h>
> being included.  The appropriate patch is certainly simple enough!
> This could be an adventure. . ..

Let the adventure begin!  This is something we need to do.

Best Regards,

-- 
Daniel Robbins					<drobbins@gentoo.org>
Chief Architect/President			http://www.gentoo.org 
Gentoo Technologies, Inc.