From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,DMARC_NONE, INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from vsmtp.wi.securepipe.com ([64.73.37.228] ident=AUser) by cvs.gentoo.org with smtp (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15slYC-0008Hp-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2001 07:43:33 -0600 Received: (qmail 13963 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2001 13:39:56 -0000 Received: from dslr-72.madison.chorus.net (HELO honker) (216.165.182.72) by 0 with SMTP; 14 Oct 2001 13:39:56 -0000 From: Jon Nelson To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Fwd: [gentoo-ebuild] updated apache ebuild Message-Id: <20011014085409.6f294898.jnelson@jamponi.net> In-Reply-To: <200109251812.UAA06944@mailgw3.netvision.net.il> References: <200109251812.UAA06944@mailgw3.netvision.net.il> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.3 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sun Oct 14 07:44:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 08:54:09 -0500 X-Archives-Salt: dcf139aa-347e-422e-951e-bd3fdc9b8e16 X-Archives-Hash: 5814631bc2ea89564060a9c4948a2f54 I noticed that there had neither been discussion nor action on the following suggestions. I feel the suggestions made are good (I made them), and worth discussing and implementing. What is my next step? Also, how does something go from incoming to its proper place in /usr/portage? > I request that the apache ebuild and associated files be updated with the > following alterations: > > Rename /etc/httpd to /etc/apache > Rename /etc/init.d/httpd to /etc/init.d/apache > Rename /usr/lib/httpd to /usr/lib/apache > Rename /usr/local/httpd to /usr/local/apache > Rename /var/cache/httpd to /var/cache/apache > > /var/log/apache and /usr/include/apache already follow this standard. > > all pertinent paths s/httpd/apache/g > > Why? More than one httpd can be installed. I don't think that > packages should use filenames or paths that reflect their purpose, > but rather continue to use their name instead. -- Pound for pound, the amoeba is the most vicious animal on earth. Jon Nelson jnelson@jamponi.net