From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24, DMARC_MISSING,FROM_GOV_SPOOF,INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from apollo.fedworld.gov ([192.239.92.203]) by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15rg8f-00033z-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 07:44:41 -0600 Received: from nobody3057.fedworld.gov ([208.232.200.57]) by apollo.fedworld.gov (8.9.3 (PHNE_22672)/8.8.6) with SMTP id JAA28100; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:44:17 -0400 (EDT) From: James M Long To: Gold is Heavy Cc: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] debugging pan crash Message-Id: <20011011095131.2e1d452e.jlong@fedworld.gov> In-Reply-To: References: <20011011090323.79164a62.jlong@fedworld.gov> Organization: NTIS X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Oct 11 07:45:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:51:31 -0500 X-Archives-Salt: acab68ac-f9b1-4c96-873f-efbe16db0163 X-Archives-Hash: cea7b48eb8a7801ff66c2437884385b9 On Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:29:48 -0400 Gold is Heavy wrote: > On Thursday 11 October 2001 10:03 am, James M Long wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 20:06:59 -0400 > > > > Gold is Heavy wrote: > > > [pan is broken message snipped] > > I am surprised that no one has looked at the pan website itself. It clearly > > I did read it. Why did you think I did not? Well I wasn't sure, based on what I thought I read... also, when I looked at the ebuild, I was looking at the old ebuild, since I hadn't done a --clean rsync. So I apologize for me jumping the gun. I have Pan running on one of my machines at home and haven't had any problems, but then again I have the GNOME USE flag in place. Currently I am installing the PAN 0.10.92 ebuild without the GNOME USE flag just to see what the heck happens. [ remainer removed ] -- James M Long jlong@fedworld.gov Linux System Admin/Network Engineer semaj@semaj.org NTIS http://semaj.org