From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,
	INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NO_RELAYS autolearn=no
	autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0
Received: from drobbins by cvs.gentoo.org with local (Exim 3.30 #1)
	id 15oUpw-00072c-00
	for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2001 13:04:12 -0600
From: Daniel Robbins <drobbins@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] USE variables in SRC_URI
Message-ID: <20011002130412.G25316@cvs.gentoo.org>
References: <20011002004034.A25316@cvs.gentoo.org> <3BBA0905.9010906@post.netlink.se> <20011002123929.E25316@cvs.gentoo.org> <200110021900.VAA21902@mailgw3.netvision.net.il>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200110021900.VAA21902@mailgw3.netvision.net.il>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@cvs.gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@cvs.gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list <gentoo-dev.cvs.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@cvs.gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://cvs.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
Date: Tue Oct  2 13:05:01 2001
X-Original-Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 13:04:12 -0600
X-Archives-Salt: a527406b-9ecb-4f31-91a0-be35a84f4dab
X-Archives-Hash: 8ad3ef53509d37cd4c8abacf2f790833

On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 09:01:15PM +0200, Dan Armak wrote:

> So: I propose that to make ebuilds behave the same way regardless of 
> MAINTAINER, we should set $A the proper way, and download all files anyway.
> 
> Perhaps you think this issue isn't very important; I admit I never wrote or 
> saw an ebuild that behaved like this. But they might.

I believe that I've taken these situations into account.  Try the code and let
me know.

Best Regards,

-- 
Daniel Robbins					<drobbins@gentoo.org>
Chief Architect/President			http://www.gentoo.org 
Gentoo Technologies, Inc.