From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_24_48,DMARC_NONE, INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from femail12.sdc1.sfba.home.com ([24.0.95.108]) by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15oEGQ-0005jR-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2001 19:22:26 -0600 Received: from g2r61.home.com ([24.255.149.198]) by femail12.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id <20011002012312.IJEK10893.femail12.sdc1.sfba.home.com@g2r61.home.com> for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2001 18:23:12 -0700 From: Collins Richey To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.4.10 errors Message-Id: <20011001193549.66ba8f45.erichey2@home.com> In-Reply-To: <20011001191013.D11404@cvs.gentoo.org> References: <20011001192054.1416d8d4.erichey2@home.com> <20011001191013.D11404@cvs.gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.2 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Oct 1 19:23:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 19:35:49 -0600 X-Archives-Salt: bec112da-d15e-4a34-89a5-573ccc37efb7 X-Archives-Hash: 7e0ef2a44a24abb116c419f9736a8046 On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 19:10:13 -0600 Daniel Robbins wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 07:20:54PM -0600, Collins Richey wrote: > > Looks like the 2.4.10 ebuild is not quite ready for prime time. > Note, > > I did emerge rsync right before this, so I should have the latest > > sources. > > Yes, this has already been discussed on the maillist. The most > recent > version of the LVM patch doesn't work with 2.4.10. To get around > this, > just disable LVM support in your kernel and it will compile fine; or > stick with your previous kernel until the next LVM rc is released. > Thanks -- Collins Richey Denver Area gentoo_rc6 xfce+sylpheed