From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_24_48, INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NO_RELAYS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from drobbins by cvs.gentoo.org with local (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15mSEa-0002t2-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 21:53:12 -0600 From: Daniel Robbins To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/glu: x11-base/xfree-4.1.0-r2, x11-libs/gtkglarea-1.2.2 Message-ID: <20010926215312.B31606@cvs.gentoo.org> References: <20010926214050.A497205@plato.zk3.dec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010926214050.A497205@plato.zk3.dec.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 26 21:54:01 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 21:53:12 -0600 X-Archives-Salt: 060dd495-4536-4f9f-9c26-2d7b53722279 X-Archives-Hash: 49d4450a7f4948f3ca0e4b307a10d801 On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 09:40:50PM -0400, Chris Houser wrote: > So, should xfree be changed to not provide virtual/glu, or is there > something else going on? Yes, xfree should be fixed. Previous versions of xfree were configured to build their included libGLU, but we turned this off and forgot to fix the dependencies. -- Daniel Robbins Chief Architect/President http://www.gentoo.org Gentoo Technologies, Inc.