From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,DMARC_NONE, INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from tesla.newpaltz.edu ([137.140.1.102]) by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15lHye-0002P1-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 16:43:56 -0600 Received: from kodiak.chronospace.org (res63-03.resnet.newpaltz.edu [137.140.63.3]) by tesla.newpaltz.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA10718 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 18:43:01 -0400 (EDT) From: "Bruce A. Locke" To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] BitchX and esound Message-Id: <20010923184424.2fd3eb55.blocke@shivan.org> In-Reply-To: <20010923183241.338f93a8.blocke@shivan.org> References: <20010922232229.382ed84d.blocke@shivan.org> <1001258058.28662.339.camel@zoidberg> <20010923183241.338f93a8.blocke@shivan.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.2 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sun Sep 23 16:44:01 2001 X-Original-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 18:44:24 -0400 X-Archives-Salt: b636bb7a-fd5b-4d46-aebb-e673095faeac X-Archives-Hash: 93cbe84cbe9e01b7647c750e58c5524d On Sun, 23 Sep 2001 18:32:41 -0400 "Bruce A. Locke" wrote: Ah someone shoot me... I found the source of the problem... Whoever did the original -r3 BitchX ebuild forgot about the makefile, etc patch we have in the files directory. I checked in a copy of the patch for -r3 while trying to debug stuff and thats probably why it started building for other people after I complained. :( With this patch BitchX now detected esound fine. Sorry everyone... > On 23 Sep 2001 17:14:18 +0200 > Mikael Hallendal wrote: > > > Btw, what idiot would name the package so that 0.2.22 is not newer than > > 0.2.5? > > I'm assuming this is the case because the test for 0.2.5+ fails in the > BitchX configure script and the authors website shows 0.2.8 as the most > recent version. Either way BitchX isn't building for me with 0.2.22. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Bruce A. Locke > blocke@shivan.org > > > _______________________________________________ > gentoo-dev mailing list > gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org > http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Bruce A. Locke blocke@shivan.org