From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,DMARC_NONE,
	INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable
	autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0
Received: from tesla.newpaltz.edu ([137.140.1.102])
	by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1)
	id 15lHnJ-0002Lt-00
	for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 16:32:14 -0600
Received: from kodiak.chronospace.org (res63-03.resnet.newpaltz.edu [137.140.63.3])
	by tesla.newpaltz.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA10038
	for <gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org>; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 18:31:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Bruce A. Locke" <blocke@shivan.org>
To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] BitchX and esound
Message-Id: <20010923183241.338f93a8.blocke@shivan.org>
In-Reply-To: <1001258058.28662.339.camel@zoidberg>
References: <20010922232229.382ed84d.blocke@shivan.org>
	<1001258058.28662.339.camel@zoidberg>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.2 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@cvs.gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@cvs.gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list <gentoo-dev.cvs.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@cvs.gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://cvs.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
Date: Sun Sep 23 16:33:02 2001
X-Original-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 18:32:41 -0400
X-Archives-Salt: 947f61c6-3636-4d97-8f39-b7d415adc17e
X-Archives-Hash: 45b2b4bc6be3217ad69873429fbf057c

On 23 Sep 2001 17:14:18 +0200
Mikael Hallendal <micke@codefactory.se> wrote:

> Btw, what idiot would name the package so that 0.2.22 is not newer than
> 0.2.5? 

I'm assuming this is the case because the test for 0.2.5+ fails in the
BitchX configure script and the authors website shows 0.2.8 as the most
recent version.  Either way BitchX isn't building for me with 0.2.22.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Bruce A. Locke
blocke@shivan.org