From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,DMARC_NONE,
	INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=4.0.0
Received: from freya.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.14])
	by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1)
	id 15khwe-0003Kx-00
	for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 02:15:29 -0600
Received: from there (ras1-p18.rlz.netvision.net.il [62.0.84.18])
	by freya.inter.net.il (Mirapoint)
	with SMTP id AXW91684;
	Sat, 22 Sep 2001 11:14:09 +0300 (IDT)
Message-Id: <200109220814.AXW91684@freya.inter.net.il>
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Dan Armak <danarmak@gentoo.org>
Organization: Gentoo Linux
To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Several questions more
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1]
References: <200109201247.OAA23155@www8.emo.freenet-rz.de> <20010920173613.51fc0866.erichey2@home.com> <003201c142d5$906ca0f0$b507e0d5@scorpion>
In-Reply-To: <003201c142d5$906ca0f0$b507e0d5@scorpion>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@cvs.gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@cvs.gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list <gentoo-dev.cvs.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@cvs.gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://cvs.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
Date: Sat Sep 22 02:16:01 2001
X-Original-Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 04:45:33 +0300
X-Archives-Salt: 1577297b-0be2-4bc6-be6a-b1f53ec6b3c2
X-Archives-Hash: e6ea5e0b1c29a1419ec665d8594fc1d0

On Friday 21 September 2001 22:42, you wrote:
> 1°  Kdevelop has version 1.4.1 in portage... 2.0.x is out quite a while now
> isn't it?
>       How come everything from KDE is so up-to-date, and only kdevelop is
> left behind?
Kdevelop, Koffice and Quanta have in fact been somewhat left behind. They are 
scheduled to be updated during the next week, now that we have a stable 
kde-base set.

-- 

Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team
Matan, Israel