* [gentoo-dev] BIND masked issue
@ 2001-09-20 8:32 Ben Lutgens
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Ben Lutgens @ 2001-09-20 8:32 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 929 bytes --]
Hey all, I have a question. I was informed that bind-8.2.3 package was
failing to emerge due to being masked. On further investigation of that I
discovered that it's not masked and only noticed the following things.
DEPEND="virtual/glibc sys-apps/groff sys-devel/flex"
RDEPEND="virtual/glibc"
I removed the RDEPEND cause it seems redundant, and it's not like glibc
will ever not be installed anyway.
I then changed the depend line to
DEPEND="virtual/glibc
>=sys-apps/groff-1.16.1
>=sys-devel/flex-2.5.4"
My question is, is the way it was correct? Can we do that (sys-apps/groff)
notation for non-virtual DEPENDS? I woulnd't advise it anyway as I'd think
it best if we only allow packages to emerge against DEPENDS that we know to
work.
--
Ben Lutgens
Sistina Software Inc.
"In the war against terrorism, there are no rear lines. We're all on the
front lines" - William Cohen
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2001-09-20 14:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-09-20 8:32 [gentoo-dev] BIND masked issue Ben Lutgens
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox