From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,DMARC_NONE, INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from femail35.sdc1.sfba.home.com ([24.254.60.25]) by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15gYu1-0008Bu-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 15:47:37 -0600 Received: from g2r61.home.com ([24.255.149.198]) by femail35.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id <20010910214700.WOBN12461.femail35.sdc1.sfba.home.com@g2r61.home.com> for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:47:00 -0700 From: Collins Richey To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Kde2.2 again (_rc6) Message-Id: <20010910155854.3961410c.erichey2@home.com> In-Reply-To: <200109100523.AXG82558@heimdall.inter.net.il> References: <200109100129.VAA14203@acmey.gatech.edu> <200109100523.AXG82558@heimdall.inter.net.il> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.5.2 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 10 15:48:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 15:58:54 -0600 X-Archives-Salt: 77eee3b4-8414-4195-ad12-b606d31ab7bf X-Archives-Hash: 61f08abadfccca59e6b83bb5f4648b3a On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 08:23:29 +0300 Dan Armak wrote: > Interesting. I don't use alsa myself, so I can't test it. Is this a > bug in > KDE? If so, it's probably fixed in 2.2.1 released yesterday :-). > What exactly > occasions it, and should we put a fix in our ebuilds? > I would assume the problem is a tightening of the rules by later gcc compilers; otherwise, there's no way the code could have compiled for KDE developers. Since 2.2.1 is out, there's probably no need to patch the 2.2 code. -- Collins Richey Denver Area gentoo_rc6 xfce+sylpheed