From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.8 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06, DMARC_NONE,INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from mail12.speakeasy.net ([216.254.0.212] helo=mail.speakeasy.net) by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15gsr7-00063N-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 13:05:57 -0600 Received: (qmail 21896 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2001 19:05:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO yde) ([66.92.103.162]) (envelope-sender ) by mail12.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 11 Sep 2001 19:05:23 -0000 Received: from agriffis by yde with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15gWKP-0001c2-00 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 15:02:41 -0400 From: Aron Griffis To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] vim Message-ID: <20010910150241.D9555@yde.flatmonk.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org References: <20010910090417.A5791@yde.flatmonk.org> <1000215485.26680.74.camel@fry> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1000215485.26680.74.camel@fry> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i X-Mailer: Mutt http://www.mutt.org/ X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/ X-URL: http://bigfoot.com/~agriffis/ Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 11 13:06:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 15:02:41 -0400 X-Archives-Salt: 090b02b9-bbf5-4ccc-8d93-af4000006dd4 X-Archives-Hash: 3a63c7e9c4bde6110eaa825d32c0d4bd Hallski wrote: [Tue Sep 11 2001, 09:38:05AM EDT] > m_ 2001-09-10 klockan 15.04 skrev Aron Griffis: > > I'm considering a change and would like feedback on it. Currently there > > are two ebuilds for vim. The first is sys-apps/vim-nogui, the second is > > app-editors/vim-gtk. > > > > I would like to collapse these into a single ebuild called > > app-editors/vim. This ebuild fulfills the following goals: > > I think this is a good idea _if_ when building with USE=gtk+ for example > the non-gui-version is built too. I mean, just because you like a > gui-version sometimes you probably also want a non-gui (to use in a > term/console). Indeed, that is what it does. :-) > If this is true I think this is the correct way, there are other > packages that I'd like to see merged too. Great! Thanks. I'll probably go ahead and commit this eventually. I would like to know a couple things to be able to execute this well, though: (1) What ramifications are there to sys-apps/vim-nogui disappearing? (2) Is there any method by which app-editors/vim can be marked as upgrading both sys-apps/vim-nogui and app-editors/vim-gtk? Thanks, Aron