From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, DMARC_MISSING,INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from janus.prosalg.no ([213.236.139.1] helo=io.adm.prosalg.no) by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15bgAF-0001TD-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 04:32:12 -0600 Received: from karltk by io.adm.prosalg.no with local (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 15bg7c-0002Wm-00 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 12:29:28 +0200 From: Karl Trygve Kalleberg To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] LHS Message-ID: <20010828122928.C9655@prosalg.no> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i In-Reply-To: ; from djb5891@cs.rit.edu on Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 04:04:07PM -0400 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Reply-To: karltk@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Aug 28 04:33:01 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 12:29:28 +0200 X-Archives-Salt: 37fe615b-b13d-4f41-bc46-a002b92d4fc6 X-Archives-Hash: b4ce24053c16ef96cc06e451a0b1c55b On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 04:04:07PM -0400, Derek J. Belrose wrote: > How well does Gentoo hold up against the LHS? If it doesn't, is that a > plan for the future? We plan to be FHS-compliant, if that is what you're referring to. There has been some tests done in this area, but we've yet to set up automated tests for it. Once I get settled in, I'll see if I can't set up a tinderbox where we can run regular tests, such as FHS compliance and ebuild-testing. Regards, Karl T