* [gentoo-dev] flwm ebuild "fix"
@ 2001-08-08 15:05 Hendrik Visage
2001-08-08 15:11 ` Dan Armak
2001-08-08 20:07 ` tadpol
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Hendrik Visage @ 2001-08-08 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Hi there,
The flwm -1.0 ebuild have a problem by not adding the
-lGL option to the Makefile's LIBS.
my Quick fix:
src_compile() {
try ./configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --host=${CHOST}
added> try vim -s /tmp/t Makefile
try make
}
with /tmp/t:
---snip---
:1,$s/LIBS =/LIBS = -lGL /
:x
---snip---
Hendrik
--
------------------------
Hendrik Visage
hvisage@envisage.co.za
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] flwm ebuild "fix"
2001-08-08 15:05 [gentoo-dev] flwm ebuild "fix" Hendrik Visage
@ 2001-08-08 15:11 ` Dan Armak
2001-08-08 15:21 ` Ben Lutgens
2001-08-08 20:07 ` tadpol
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Dan Armak @ 2001-08-08 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Thursday 09 August 2001 00:04, you wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> The flwm -1.0 ebuild have a problem by not adding the
> -lGL option to the Makefile's LIBS.
>
> my Quick fix:
>
> src_compile() {
> try ./configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --host=${CHOST}
> added> try vim -s /tmp/t Makefile
> try make
> }
>
> with /tmp/t:
> ---snip---
>
> :1,$s/LIBS =/LIBS = -lGL /
> :x
>
> ---snip---
>
> Hendrik
Such "fixes" don't go into incoming, I suppose. Should the issue be
redirected somehow to the ebuilds maintainer or team or should a maintainer
be responsible for finding it here? drobbins?
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team
Matan, Israel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] flwm ebuild "fix"
2001-08-08 15:11 ` Dan Armak
@ 2001-08-08 15:21 ` Ben Lutgens
2001-08-08 15:40 ` Dan Armak
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ben Lutgens @ 2001-08-08 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 504 bytes --]
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:10:41AM +0300, Dan Armak wrote:
>On Thursday 09 August 2001 00:04, you wrote:
>
>Such "fixes" don't go into incoming, I suppose. Should the issue be
>redirected somehow to the ebuilds maintainer or team or should a maintainer
>be responsible for finding it here? drobbins?
>
I know I'mmore likely to see it if itcomes directly to me.
--
Ben Lutgens
Sistina Software Inc.
What's the difference between root and God ?
God doesn't think that he is root.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] flwm ebuild "fix"
2001-08-08 15:21 ` Ben Lutgens
@ 2001-08-08 15:40 ` Dan Armak
2001-08-08 18:34 ` Ben Lutgens
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Dan Armak @ 2001-08-08 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Thursday 09 August 2001 00:21, you wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:10:41AM +0300, Dan Armak wrote:
> >On Thursday 09 August 2001 00:04, you wrote:
> >
> >Such "fixes" don't go into incoming, I suppose. Should the issue be
> >redirected somehow to the ebuilds maintainer or team or should a
> > maintainer be responsible for finding it here? drobbins?
>
> I know I'mmore likely to see it if itcomes directly to me.
Hm, this doesn't exactly fit in etiher gentoo-dev or gentoo-ebuild. A
dev-wiki note would seem to be too much effort for such a small matter, and
it can't be "pointed" to a specific developer, only a team. and the team
mailing lists are for team members only. What's left is mailing developers
directly. Any ideas?
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team
Matan, Israel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] flwm ebuild "fix"
2001-08-08 15:40 ` Dan Armak
@ 2001-08-08 18:34 ` Ben Lutgens
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ben Lutgens @ 2001-08-08 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 620 bytes --]
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:40:25AM +0300, Dan Armak wrote:
>
>Hm, this doesn't exactly fit in etiher gentoo-dev or gentoo-ebuild. A
>dev-wiki note would seem to be too much effort for such a small matter, and
>it can't be "pointed" to a specific developer, only a team. and the team
>mailing lists are for team members only. What's left is mailing developers
>directly. Any ideas?
>
Bug tracking system that automagically mails the maintainer...
Too much work initially.
--
Ben Lutgens
Sistina Software Inc.
What's the difference between root and God ?
God doesn't think that he is root.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] flwm ebuild "fix"
2001-08-08 15:05 [gentoo-dev] flwm ebuild "fix" Hendrik Visage
2001-08-08 15:11 ` Dan Armak
@ 2001-08-08 20:07 ` tadpol
2001-08-08 20:35 ` Hendrik Visage
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: tadpol @ 2001-08-08 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: Hendrik Visage
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 11:04:22PM +0200, Hendrik Visage wrote:
> The flwm -1.0 ebuild have a problem by not adding the
> -lGL option to the Makefile's LIBS.
>
> my Quick fix:
>
> src_compile() {
> try ./configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --host=${CHOST}
> added> try vim -s /tmp/t Makefile
> try make
> }
>
> with /tmp/t:
> ---snip---
> :1,$s/LIBS =/LIBS = -lGL /
> :x
> ---snip---
that's odd. flwm builds for me just fine without the -lGL.
care to share your USE line? And the USE line for fltk too. You can get
both from /var/db/pkg/<base dir>/<package dir>/USE
(that'd be /var/db/pkg/x11-wm/flwm-1.00/USE and
/var/db/pkg/x11-libs/fltk-1.0.11/USE )
I don't have any form of gl in my use line, so I wonder if that's it?
(i'll see if I can test that, but not having a dedicated box for testing
ebuilds, makes for difficulties.)
--
Michael Tilstra tadpol@tadpol.org
<CONTROL-G> if you love peace and quiet.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] flwm ebuild "fix"
2001-08-08 20:07 ` tadpol
@ 2001-08-08 20:35 ` Hendrik Visage
2001-08-08 20:41 ` Hendrik Visage
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Hendrik Visage @ 2001-08-08 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 09:05:57PM -0500, tadpol@tadpol.org wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 11:04:22PM +0200, Hendrik Visage wrote:
> > The flwm -1.0 ebuild have a problem by not adding the
> > -lGL option to the Makefile's LIBS.
> >
> > my Quick fix:
> >
> > src_compile() {
> > try ./configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --host=${CHOST}
> > added> try vim -s /tmp/t Makefile
> > try make
> > }
> >
> > with /tmp/t:
> > ---snip---
> > :1,$s/LIBS =/LIBS = -lGL /
> > :x
> > ---snip---
>
> that's odd. flwm builds for me just fine without the -lGL.
> care to share your USE line? And the USE line for fltk too. You can get
> both from /var/db/pkg/<base dir>/<package dir>/USE
> (that'd be /var/db/pkg/x11-wm/flwm-1.00/USE and
> /var/db/pkg/x11-libs/fltk-1.0.11/USE )
slang readline gpm berkdb gdbm tcpd pam libwww ssl
lm_sensors lvm pcmcia-cs alsa
nls mmx mitshm gtk X
esd lcms gif sdl vorbis ogg 3dnow
gnome qt kde motif opengl mozilla
For both of them.
> I don't have any form of gl in my use line, so I wonder if that's it?
> (i'll see if I can test that, but not having a dedicated box for testing
> ebuilds, makes for difficulties.)
>
> --
> Michael Tilstra tadpol@tadpol.org
> <CONTROL-G> if you love peace and quiet.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org
> http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
--
------------------------
Hendrik Visage
hvisage@envisage.co.za
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] flwm ebuild "fix"
2001-08-08 20:35 ` Hendrik Visage
@ 2001-08-08 20:41 ` Hendrik Visage
2001-08-08 21:10 ` tadpol
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Hendrik Visage @ 2001-08-08 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 04:33:48AM +0200, Hendrik Visage wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 09:05:57PM -0500, tadpol@tadpol.org wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 11:04:22PM +0200, Hendrik Visage wrote:
> > > The flwm -1.0 ebuild have a problem by not adding the
> > > -lGL option to the Makefile's LIBS.
> > >
> > > my Quick fix:
> > >
> > > src_compile() {
> > > try ./configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --host=${CHOST}
> > > added> try vim -s /tmp/t Makefile
> > > try make
> > > }
> > >
> > > with /tmp/t:
> > > ---snip---
> > > :1,$s/LIBS =/LIBS = -lGL /
> > > :x
> > > ---snip---
> >
> > that's odd. flwm builds for me just fine without the -lGL.
> > care to share your USE line? And the USE line for fltk too. You can get
> > both from /var/db/pkg/<base dir>/<package dir>/USE
> > (that'd be /var/db/pkg/x11-wm/flwm-1.00/USE and
> > /var/db/pkg/x11-libs/fltk-1.0.11/USE )
Have to add: I somehow got the same results when doing a standard
extract, ./configure & make also. Something that's laying around ?
bash-2.04# ldd `which flwm`
libfltk.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libfltk.so.1 (0x4001f000)
libGL.so.1 => /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 (0x4007e000)
libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x40255000)
libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x4033f000)
libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 =>
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/2.95.3/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 (0x4034e000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x4039e000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x403c1000)
libSM.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x404e4000)
libICE.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x404ee000)
libXmu.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXmu.so.6 (0x40507000)
libXi.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6 (0x4051d000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x40525000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
libXt.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x4053b000)
> slang readline gpm berkdb gdbm tcpd pam libwww ssl
> lm_sensors lvm pcmcia-cs alsa
> nls mmx mitshm gtk X
> esd lcms gif sdl vorbis ogg 3dnow
> gnome qt kde motif opengl mozilla
>
> For both of them.
>
> > I don't have any form of gl in my use line, so I wonder if that's it?
> > (i'll see if I can test that, but not having a dedicated box for testing
> > ebuilds, makes for difficulties.)
> >
> > --
> > Michael Tilstra tadpol@tadpol.org
> > <CONTROL-G> if you love peace and quiet.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gentoo-dev mailing list
> > gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org
> > http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
>
> --
> ------------------------
> Hendrik Visage
> hvisage@envisage.co.za
>
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org
> http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
--
------------------------
Hendrik Visage
hvisage@envisage.co.za
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] flwm ebuild "fix"
2001-08-08 20:41 ` Hendrik Visage
@ 2001-08-08 21:10 ` tadpol
2001-08-08 21:39 ` tadpol
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: tadpol @ 2001-08-08 21:10 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Hendrik Visage; +Cc: gentoo-dev
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 04:40:28AM +0200, Hendrik Visage wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 04:33:48AM +0200, Hendrik Visage wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 09:05:57PM -0500, tadpol@tadpol.org wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 11:04:22PM +0200, Hendrik Visage wrote:
> > > > The flwm -1.0 ebuild have a problem by not adding the
> > > > -lGL option to the Makefile's LIBS.
> Have to add: I somehow got the same results when doing a standard
> extract, ./configure & make also. Something that's laying around ?
same results meaning you had to patch the makefile?
this actually kinda looks like a package bug. My off hand guess is that
since fltk has optional support for opengl, the flwm author didn't build
support for it. This really should be soemthing configure detects
(something in the same maner as gtk-config --libs, something to get which
libs are needed for the fltk tool kit. since it is the what needs the gl
libs.)
hmmm. try something for me.
cd /usr/portage/x11-wm/flwm/
env X_EXTRA_LIBS=-lGL ebuild flwm-1.00.ebuild
if that works, I'll add stuff to the ebuild to look for the opengl USE tag.
later,
--
Michael Tilstra tadpol@tadpol.org
Help support helpless victims of computer error.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] flwm ebuild "fix"
2001-08-08 21:10 ` tadpol
@ 2001-08-08 21:39 ` tadpol
2001-08-09 13:24 ` Hendrik Visage
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: tadpol @ 2001-08-08 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Hendrik Visage; +Cc: gentoo-dev
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 10:08:37PM -0500, mike tilstra wrote:
> hmmm. try something for me.
>
> cd /usr/portage/x11-wm/flwm/
> env X_EXTRA_LIBS=-lGL ebuild flwm-1.00.ebuild
>
>
> if that works, I'll add stuff to the ebuild to look for the opengl USE tag.
or my brain will engage, and I will remmeber that X4 provides GL, so I can
test this myself.
right so, flwm-1.00-r1 is getting uploaded, with a use opengl detect. it
works for me, and ldd shows a correctly linked binary.
Thanks for the bug report.
--
Michael Tilstra tadpol@tadpol.org
Sex is like air; it's not important unless you aren't getting any.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] flwm ebuild "fix"
2001-08-08 21:39 ` tadpol
@ 2001-08-09 13:24 ` Hendrik Visage
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Hendrik Visage @ 2001-08-09 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw
To: tadpol; +Cc: Hendrik Visage, gentoo-dev
-r1 works, thanx.
Something else that would be appreciated for -r2 :)
please add the following into /usr/X11R6/bin/wm/flwm:
---snip---
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/X11R6/bin/flwm
---snip---
It's for the xdm and friends that source that for the window manager :)
Perhaps something to send to the flwm guys.
Thanx
Hendrik
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 10:37:04PM -0500, tadpol@tadpol.org wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 10:08:37PM -0500, mike tilstra wrote:
> > hmmm. try something for me.
> >
> > cd /usr/portage/x11-wm/flwm/
> > env X_EXTRA_LIBS=-lGL ebuild flwm-1.00.ebuild
> >
> >
> > if that works, I'll add stuff to the ebuild to look for the opengl USE tag.
>
> or my brain will engage, and I will remmeber that X4 provides GL, so I can
> test this myself.
>
> right so, flwm-1.00-r1 is getting uploaded, with a use opengl detect. it
> works for me, and ldd shows a correctly linked binary.
>
> Thanks for the bug report.
> --
> Michael Tilstra tadpol@tadpol.org
> Sex is like air; it's not important unless you aren't getting any.
--
------------------------
Hendrik Visage
hvisage@envisage.co.za
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-08-09 19:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-08-08 15:05 [gentoo-dev] flwm ebuild "fix" Hendrik Visage
2001-08-08 15:11 ` Dan Armak
2001-08-08 15:21 ` Ben Lutgens
2001-08-08 15:40 ` Dan Armak
2001-08-08 18:34 ` Ben Lutgens
2001-08-08 20:07 ` tadpol
2001-08-08 20:35 ` Hendrik Visage
2001-08-08 20:41 ` Hendrik Visage
2001-08-08 21:10 ` tadpol
2001-08-08 21:39 ` tadpol
2001-08-09 13:24 ` Hendrik Visage
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox