From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_24_48, DMARC_MISSING,INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from janus.prosalg.no ([213.236.139.1] helo=io.adm.prosalg.no) by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15TYAK-0000Lk-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Sun, 05 Aug 2001 18:22:40 -0600 Received: from karltk by io.adm.prosalg.no with local (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 15TY9l-0006eP-00 for ; Mon, 06 Aug 2001 02:22:05 +0200 From: Karl Trygve Kalleberg To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-lisp Message-ID: <20010806022205.C25475@prosalg.no> References: <20010803040730.B24491@prosalg.no> <01080310182907.00608@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i In-Reply-To: <01080310182907.00608@localhost>; from danarmak@gentoo.org on Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 10:18:29AM +0300 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Reply-To: karltk@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sun Aug 5 18:23:01 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 02:22:05 +0200 X-Archives-Salt: 75f1d9d0-d3b6-4981-b1ea-291939865b21 X-Archives-Hash: 2561c2365ee45cff214d42b14c39b146 On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 10:18:29AM +0300, Dan Armak wrote: > If you haven't yet, please move the ebuilds you submitted here from incoming > to their rightful places and grab their items on dev-wiki. There's only one > left there I think, python-docs. Chadh already grabbed this one. Also, would it not be a good idea for another team member than the original submitter to grab the item and do the actual verification and move ? This way, we get at least a minimum of "code-review" before the script is sent off into the dangerous Real World. Regards, Karl T