From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_24_48, INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NO_RELAYS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from drobbins by cvs.gentoo.org with local (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15RPjm-0008TD-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2001 20:58:26 -0600 From: Daniel Robbins To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] User ebuilds: all developers, please read this Message-ID: <20010730205826.G27325@cvs.gentoo.org> References: <0107302357590L.00612@localhost> <20010730204329.B30944@cvs.gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010730204329.B30944@cvs.gentoo.org>; from pm@gentoo.org on Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 08:43:29PM -0600 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Jul 30 20:59:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 20:58:26 -0600 X-Archives-Salt: 6183492e-f73f-44ba-9320-cba290dcf974 X-Archives-Hash: 7200c2697b5e34c60bf1ab1a158d78ee On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 08:43:29PM -0600, Parag Mehta wrote: > Hi Dan, > > A suggestion, > > why don't we create the directory structure in the following manner : [snip] > what do you all think ?? There's nothing wrong with that solution, but probably a bit redundant since the info is already in the comment at the top of every ebuild. But of course, there is no one right way to set up an incoming directory. The structure of /usr/portage/incoming is up to Dan Armak; I'll let him arrange it as he sees fit. Best Regards, -- Daniel Robbins Chief Architect/President http://www.gentoo.org Gentoo Technologies, Inc.