From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_24_48, INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NO_RELAYS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from pm by cvs.gentoo.org with local (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15RPVJ-00085k-00 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2001 20:43:29 -0600 From: Parag Mehta To: gentoo-dev Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] User ebuilds: all developers, please read this Message-ID: <20010730204329.B30944@cvs.gentoo.org> References: <0107302357590L.00612@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <0107302357590L.00612@localhost>; from danarmak@gentoo.org on Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 11:57:59PM +0300 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Jul 30 20:44:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 20:43:29 -0600 X-Archives-Salt: c561262b-7f52-4dba-ad2f-b7587ccb707d X-Archives-Hash: 477e9cd8dcf8b8360199311832a2fd83 Hi Dan, A suggestion, why don't we create the directory structure in the following manner : /usr/portage/incoming then for each ebuild under this should be something like this : foo@foo.com/pkg_name/foo.ebuild so the final directory looks like this : /usr/portage/incoming/foo@foo.com/pkg_name/foo.ebuild so that we can hv proper contact methods for the user who has written those ebuilds as well all ebuilds by one user can remain under the same user directory. what do you all think ?? Regards, pm -- Gentoo Linux Developer