From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,DMARC_QUAR, INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from cj647207-a.reston1.va.home.com ([65.1.132.232] helo=gemini.thehutt.org) by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15OgI8-0003Pw-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 08:02:36 -0600 Received: from root by gemini.thehutt.org with local (Exim 3.31 #1) id 15OgIT-0004ph-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 10:02:57 -0400 From: Jerry A! To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] MOSIX and kernel 2.4.6 Message-ID: <20010723100257.A18556@gemini.thehutt.org> References: <1DCB85BD45DED211B12D009027279E4F476804@murcury> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <1DCB85BD45DED211B12D009027279E4F476804@murcury>; from SMitchell@phoenix-interactive.com on Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:32:34AM -0400 Organization: Broken Toys Unlimited Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Reply-To: jerry@thehutt.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Jul 23 08:03:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 10:02:57 -0400 X-Archives-Salt: 4ae61a4d-aeb3-4542-bab7-1286651d4b36 X-Archives-Hash: 911a6bc25e554b9d1a2f1bd4650600b8 On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:32:34AM -0400, Sean Mitchell wrote: : : Aha! Thanks Jerry... all the posts I saw on the subject (including one by : Alan Cox) suggested starting with a clean tree which did work me (no deps at : that point). I think your suggestion was in fact my problem. At any rate it : was suggested that the makefiles in recent kernels are somehow broken. Not : sure if this is actually the case, but.... The makefiles aren't broken, just the people that use them. 8) Most of the people that I've seen have this issue aren't used to constantly changing kernels. They're used to having 2.2.1x on their tree and never needing to do a "make dep" after their initial configuration. Alas, we're living in a world where we're getting a kernel rev per week, so this stuff gonna happen more and more often. --Jerry name: Jerry Alexandratos || Open-Source software isn't a phone: 703.599.6023 || matter of life or death... email: jerry@thehutt.org || ...It's much more important || than that!