Re: [gentoo-dev] why multilog?

[Jerry A! <jerry@thehutt.org>]

On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 12:48:07PM -0600, Daniel Robbins wrote:
: On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 10:27:37AM +0000, Thomas Beaudry wrote:
: > If you're still looking for a supervise replacement, I just stumbled over 
: > this:
: > 
: > http://www.tildeslash.com/monit/
: 
: >From reading the README file on the Monit Web site, it looks like Monit does
: everything we would need and also would be easy to integrate into the system.
: Jerry, Grant: could you look into monit as you have time and see if it you can
: find any deficiencies?  Otherwise, this looks like a great solution.  And it
: seems a lot less invasive than daemontools.
: 
: Thanks for the link, Thomas! :)

I looked at it briefly.  I agree that this is the best of the solutions
that I've been exploring.  I'm gonna try to wrap up the mail stuff and
work more in-depth on this in the upcoming week.

        --Jerry

name:  Jerry Alexandratos         ||  Open-Source software isn't a
phone: 703.599.6023               ||  matter of life or death...
email: jerry@thehutt.org          ||  ...It's much more important
                                  ||  than that!