From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24, INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NO_RELAYS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from drobbins by cvs.gentoo.org with local (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15MdB6-0000Ue-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 16:18:52 -0600 From: Daniel Robbins To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild execute permissions: problem with cvs Message-ID: <20010717161852.A1859@cvs.gentoo.org> References: <01071723392805.00582@localhost> <20010717145220.B2641@cvs.gentoo.org> <01071800160406.00582@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <01071800160406.00582@localhost>; from danarmak@gentoo.org on Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 12:16:04AM +0300 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Jul 17 16:19:01 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 16:18:52 -0600 X-Archives-Salt: ad84298c-c3e8-433a-bc38-cd3c88f934a7 X-Archives-Hash: 859f825b8c8d08bda69eaa550aef2dda On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 12:16:04AM +0300, Dan Armak wrote: > > OK, I did some things to the CVS repository and now all ebuilds should > > *not* be executable. I didn't want to do it to all files because I'm sure > > we have some executable scripts lying around somewhere and I don't want to > > mess them up. This problem may have been caused by a permissions mishap > > caused my me a couple of months ago. > > > > Everything's OK now. Only cvs still doesn't see permission differences as > different revisions, so I'll have to delete and re-checkout all ebuilds. But > that's a minor point. Thanks! OK, and I also just made a small patch to emerge to make the rsync perms more correct, as well as fixing a few problems over here with rsync. Now, rsync perms should be perfect too. Best Regards, -- Daniel Robbins President/CEO http://www.gentoo.org Gentoo Technologies, Inc.