From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_24_48,DMARC_NONE,
	FREEMAIL_FROM,INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=no
	autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0
Received: from fl-mta02.durocom.com ([216.53.195.243])
	by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1)
	id 15LaC3-0003JJ-00
	for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 18:55:32 -0600
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([216.128.160.26])
          by fl-mta02.durocom.com with SMTP
          id <20010715005426.ODVZ7771.fl-mta02@localhost.localdomain>
          for <gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org>; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 20:54:26 -0400
From: Thomas Beaudry <k8la@arrl.net>
Message-ID: <20010715.543000@localhost.localdomain>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] make.conf optimization flags for k6, athlon
To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <01071323350502.00707@localhost>
References: <01071323350502.00707@localhost>
X-Mailer: Mozilla/3.0 (compatible; StarOffice/5.2;Linux)
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@cvs.gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@cvs.gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list <gentoo-dev.cvs.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@cvs.gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://cvs.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
Date: Sat Jul 14 18:56:02 2001
X-Original-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 00:54:30 GMT
X-Archives-Salt: 1aadc5b3-1c64-4454-a7df-1e9c584d7cb1
X-Archives-Hash: 444ee3278ba7f47f354bc955e072c269

A few comments I've been meaning to make.

1.  According to the GCC documentation you shouldn't be using -m<process=
or>=20
any more. It's been depreciated in favor of -mcpu<processor>.

2.  You don't need to use -mcpu usually with -march as -march sets -mcpu=
=20
for you.  I say usually 'cause there's an AMD processor (can't remember =

which) that uses a different instruction set than the default set by the=
=20
-march it uses.

3.  The usage of processor names has been depreciated as well.  Should=20
use i586, etc. instead.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<


> # For Pentium and k6/2 machines
> # -----------------------------

> #CHOST=3D"i586-pc-linux-gnu"
> #CFLAGS=3D"-mpentium -march=3Dpentium -O3 -pipe"
> #CXXFLAGS=3D"-mpentium -march=3Dpentium -O3 -pipe"