From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_24_48,DMARC_NONE, FREEMAIL_FROM,INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from fl-mta03.durocom.com ([216.53.195.244]) by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15LbpI-0003fC-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 20:40:08 -0600 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([216.128.160.26]) by fl-mta03.durocom.com with SMTP id <20010715023910.HMLR6335.fl-mta03@localhost.localdomain> for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 22:39:10 -0400 From: Thomas Beaudry Message-ID: <20010715.2391400@localhost.localdomain> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] why multilog? To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20010714122849.B397@cvs.gentoo.org> References: <20010711185657.15a99a71.blocke@shivan.org> <20010711210516.A16705@gemini.thehutt.org> <3B504B10.7D34D663@gentoo.org> <20010714122849.B397@cvs.gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Mozilla/3.0 (compatible; StarOffice/5.2;Linux) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sat Jul 14 20:41:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 02:39:14 GMT X-Archives-Salt: 62e3528f-b00d-4db6-b474-8860c745ed65 X-Archives-Hash: 4367410475927d2b7460eb9dac535c6d What is the licensing? I looked through the web site and the source cod= e=20 and could find nothing but his copyright notice. Maybe I'm just blind..= . >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< > Also, I'm having Jerry look for a supervise replacement, as both multi= log=20 and > supervise (daemontools) have non-open source licenses as it turns out,= =20 and > should not be in our default base distribution.