From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NO_RELAYS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from drobbins by cvs.gentoo.org with local (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15LKW3-00006K-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 02:11:07 -0600 From: Daniel Robbins To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] make.conf optimization flags for k6, athlon Message-ID: <20010714021107.R22931@cvs.gentoo.org> References: <01071323350502.00707@localhost> <01071323595305.00707@localhost> <20010713153731.M22931@cvs.gentoo.org> <01071410100900.00576@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <01071410100900.00576@localhost>; from ermak@netvision.net.il on Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 10:10:09AM +0300 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sat Jul 14 02:12:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 02:11:07 -0600 X-Archives-Salt: b8c62eb1-0567-4ce0-bf00-cd665f30edec X-Archives-Hash: 1ed06620708e906177236c4abf1a868f On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 10:10:09AM +0300, Dan Armak wrote: > I added it. I also added an i386 option. Does anyone know why the options > started from 486 initially? Is there a problem in using 386 (with a math > coprocessor)? Nope, a 386 should work. However, bzip2 on a 386 is, um, super-slow? It's horribly slow on a 486; imagine a 386. -- Daniel Robbins President/CEO http://www.gentoo.org Gentoo Technologies, Inc.