From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NO_RELAYS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from drobbins by cvs.gentoo.org with local (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15JqjE-0002Fx-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 00:10:36 -0600 From: Daniel Robbins To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Linux Standard Base Message-ID: <20010710001036.J29013@cvs.gentoo.org> References: <000401c10896$378a1f40$6669a8c0@ortega-lt.hsdrs.com> <01070920485302.00654@localhost> <01071008492200.00552@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <01071008492200.00552@localhost>; from ermak@netvision.net.il on Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 08:49:22AM +0300 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Jul 10 00:11:01 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 00:10:36 -0600 X-Archives-Salt: afbafa96-024b-440a-9065-ce376835c9d4 X-Archives-Hash: 6a76d56b7fa754cc720b88b571cb3b13 On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 08:49:22AM +0300, Dan Armak wrote: > The distributions are supposed to be different - that's why they exist. > Grassroots anti-LSB movement anyone?.. :-) Yep, the LSB sucks. It's basically a RedHat-compatibility manual. I'm not going to defend the LSB, but it does make sense to be as RedHat compatible as possible without making any compromises in the design of Gentoo Linux. It would be fun to start an anti-LSB movement, though =) -- Daniel Robbins President/CEO http://www.gentoo.org Gentoo Technologies, Inc.