From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24, INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NO_RELAYS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from drobbins by cvs.gentoo.org with local (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15JjAY-0008VO-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2001 16:06:18 -0600 From: Daniel Robbins To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge suggestions Message-ID: <20010709160618.G29013@cvs.gentoo.org> References: <20010709180209.A23330@gemini.thehutt.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010709180209.A23330@gemini.thehutt.org>; from jerry@thehutt.org on Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 06:02:09PM -0400 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Jul 9 16:07:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 16:06:18 -0600 X-Archives-Salt: 75754c4e-1319-4202-a4e0-486284ccd24a X-Archives-Hash: 282f2ef2684fa2d122bbf65202d2790f On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 06:02:09PM -0400, Jerry A! wrote: > Can we change the behavior of "emerge rsync" to not preserve perms? > Right now when I rsync, I get files and directories that are 777, 2777, > etc. I don't think that people expect to update their portage tree and > have the entire thing be a security nightmare. 8( > > I know that the more correct solution would be to ensure that the perms > are correct on the rsync server. However, since those seem to be victim > to chmod-rot, I think we should make sure that at least the client-side > behaves as expected... > > Also, any chance of having it ignore something like /usr/portage/local? > That way people using rsync could make out of tree changes and not have > them blown away each time they update their tree. Try remerging portage and still see if you get the 777 problem. Also, type "umask" and see if root has a umask set. If not, add one to /etc/profiles (fixed on CVS). As for LOCAL_PORTDIR support, it'll be added soon. -- Daniel Robbins President/CEO http://www.gentoo.org Gentoo Technologies, Inc.