From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_24_48,DMARC_NONE, INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from femail3.sdc1.sfba.home.com ([24.0.95.83]) by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 159cPM-0004rl-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 18:51:48 -0600 Received: from k68pc2.home.pc ([65.6.118.16]) by femail3.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id <20010612005111.OKWX1531.femail3.sdc1.sfba.home.com@k68pc2.home.pc> for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:51:11 -0700 From: Collins Richey To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Linux 1.0_rc5 status update Message-Id: <20010611190058.6fa37b1f.erichey2@home.com> In-Reply-To: <003801c0f2c9$0d6a9150$fd1942c3@bluescreen> References: <20010611131601.A3495@cvs.gentoo.org> <003801c0f2c9$0d6a9150$fd1942c3@bluescreen> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.4.66 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Jun 11 18:52:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 19:00:58 -0600 X-Archives-Salt: 3fe9af55-d2f2-40ea-8474-63b2caa33683 X-Archives-Hash: dee1ebe5065350b7202fc7054f031fc6 On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 00:51:26 +0200 "Mathijs Kwik" wrote: > Daniel and Achim and all other devs > tnx again > enjoy your vacation > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Daniel Robbins" > To: ; > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 9:16 PM > Subject: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Linux 1.0_rc5 status update > > > > Hi All, > > > > Well, Gentoo Linux 1.0_rc5 is around the corner, but first... we need a > > vacation. :) > > > > Achim has been working really hard on our Portage tree, and right now > > everything builds perfectly and all known build problems have been > fixed > for > > our ~700 packages (Thanks Achim!). In addition, we now have a > prototype > boot > > CD that actually works. So, we are _very_ close to the Gentoo Linux > 1.0_rc5 > > release; everything is falling into place. > > > > However, Achim is starting a new web company and has a lot of > outstanding > work > > to complete; also, I have quite a few articles to write over here. So, > in > > order to catch up on our consulting responsibilities, we'll be on > "vacation" > > from Gentoo Linux development for one week, starting today. We'll > resume > work > > on Gentoo Linux one week from now, on June 18th. Since we have about > one > week > > left of work before Gentoo Linux 1.0_rc5 is ready (mainly boot CD > refinements > > and package building), you can expect Gentoo Linux 1.0_rc5 to be > released > very > > close to June 25th. This date should be fairly accurate, since 95% of > the > > 1.0_rc5 work is already complete and is sitting on CVS, waiting to be > built. > > > > Developers: > > > > Achim has tagged all the 1.0_rc5 stuff, so you can continue making > improvements > > to CVS without worry. However, please try to hang out on #gentoo and > answer > > any gentoo-dev posts about your work (and any other questions, if you > can.) > > I hope you both have a wonderful vacation - glueckliche Ferien! For those of us who have already installed and are successfully running a gentoo system, would we have any need to reinstall and go through all the 30+ hours of compiles to get back to where we are now? Has anything essential changed, other than having a more reliable boot cdrom and, hopefully, error free ebuilds? Thanks, -- Collins Richey Denver area gentoo system