From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24, INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NO_RELAYS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from drobbins by cvs.gentoo.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1) id 159CP0-0003Dr-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 15:05:42 -0600 From: Daniel Robbins To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] modules.dep getting 0 bytes Message-ID: <20010610150542.C11767@cvs.gentoo.org> References: <000901c0f1ec$d73451c0$a323a00f@lisa> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <000901c0f1ec$d73451c0$a323a00f@lisa>; from erik@vanreeth.org on Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 10:35:08PM +0200 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sun Jun 10 15:06:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 15:05:42 -0600 X-Archives-Salt: 4740639a-7be9-4720-af97-6e40ed0ffb2a X-Archives-Hash: cc962e0b55f815b11dfa2816b246b826 On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 10:35:08PM +0200, Erik Van Reeth wrote: > I had a system with only kernel 2.4.4-ac9 in place, which boots perfectly. I > did a new kernel build via "ebuild ../sys-kernel/linux/linux-2.4.5.5.ebuild > qmerge". A new /lib/modules/2.4.5-ac5 directory was made. I added a new > entry to menu.lst to be able to boot the old kernel if the new one didn't > worked. Only all the *.dep files under /lib/modules/2.4.4-ac9 are being > changed with modules.dep being empty (0 bytes). So booting the older kernel > gives problems in loading modules. Also after booting kernel 2.4.5-ac5, the > modules.* are automatic generated but in the wrong directory. They were > created under 2.4.4-ac9 instead of 2.4.5-ac5. Manually doing a depmod -a > solved this behaviour. Is there some reason for this behaviour or am i doing > something wrong here ? No, there is no good reason for this behavior; the modules initscript appears to be broken. We want to fix this soon. -- Daniel Robbins President/CEO http://www.gentoo.org Gentoo Technologies, Inc.