From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_24_48, INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NO_RELAYS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from drobbins by cvs.gentoo.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1) id 14eQoV-0003jg-00 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 17:12:51 -0700 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Linux documentation Message-ID: <20010317171251.A14352@cvs.gentoo.org> References: <20010316144831.B3538@cvs.gentoo.org> <3AB3A707.47576446@gottinger.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3AB3A707.47576446@gottinger.de>; from AGottinger@t-online.de on Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 07:03:51PM +0100 From: Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sat Mar 17 17:13:03 2001 X-Original-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 17:12:51 -0700 X-Archives-Salt: c3ed94eb-91c0-45ba-8ff7-bb750d4669ad X-Archives-Hash: 2f0d56ba19ef6f69defdd16ea29ac850 On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 07:03:51PM +0100, Achim Gottinger wrote: > It's true docbook transformation need much time with these xsl's. But > since we do not use dynamic XML generation time should not be the > problem. I think that a docbook-lite format could work. My concern with docbook wasn't as much the additional processing power needed, but the additional hours and hours that may be needed to write our own XSLT to conver docbook to our desired HTML format. When designing the XSLT, it would seem that having only the XML tags we need (and no more) would be an advantage. Best Regards, -- Daniel Robbins President/CEO http://www.gentoo.org Gentoo Technologies, Inc.