From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,DMARC_QUAR, INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from arsenic.akopia.com ([204.242.142.104] helo=kabbu.reston.redhat.com) by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 14VzfE-00063q-00 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:36:25 -0700 Received: by kabbu.reston.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 1020) id 040388FF51; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 12:36:41 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry A! To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new package Message-ID: <20010222123641.B853@kabbu.reston.redhat.com> References: <20010220161804.A2338@cvs.gentoo.org> <20010220182303.A2550@kabbu.akopia.com> <3A9539D4.C6CA70E3@gottinger.de> <20010222115808.A692@kabbu.reston.redhat.com> <3A954239.555AAE3A@gottinger.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3A954239.555AAE3A@gottinger.de>; from AGottinger@t-online.de on Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 05:45:45PM +0100 Organization: Broken Toys Unlimited Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Reply-To: jerry@thehutt.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Feb 22 10:37:01 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 12:36:41 -0500 X-Archives-Salt: 87a5813a-5dd8-4411-9297-527df2221496 X-Archives-Hash: 091dc518bb227e4d9b52d4c1e45b1b4c On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 05:45:45PM +0100, Achim Gottinger wrote: : "Jerry A!" wrote: : > : > I'll do it. I'll just have to be very careful. I'll probably start : > tackling it by the beginning of next week. And I'll make sure I give a : > general alert/heads up. : : The only package that really needs care is ORBit. About 50 packages are : in dev-perl. : I personaly thought that using the sources name as we did it till now : makes more sense since it reduces the typing in the scripts. : But if you guys are not happy with that change it. Hmm... Something to consider here. I was thinking that user expectations are for things to be consistent. You know, we could always try and modify the portage code to ignore case. Daniel, what do you think of that? : PS: Jerry have you tested pgcc and is there a package in the tree that I : can use here? Sorry, it's still sitting on my machine waiting for some more tests. I'm one of those people who hates committing anything to a tree before unless it's more-or-less done. I'll commit what I have when I get home. --Jerry name: Jerry Alexandratos || Open-Source software isn't a phone: 703.599.6023 || matter of life or death... email: jerry@thehutt.org || ...It's much more important || than that!