From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,
	DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN,DMARC_NONE,INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0
Received: from rouge.snu.ac.kr ([147.46.102.25])
	by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1)
	id 14VXgV-0001UV-00
	for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 04:43:51 -0700
Received: (from redjade@localhost)
	by rouge.snu.ac.kr (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f1LBiiu09205
	for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 20:44:44 +0900 (KST)
From: Kyung-hwan Kim <redjade@rouge.snu.ac.kr>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.2.2 / binutils-2.1.10.0.7 are incompatible/buggy!!!!! Don't use them on rc4_pre
Message-ID: <20010221204444.A9198@rouge.snu.ac.kr>
References: <3A90BA1F.5C3183BD@gottinger.de> <20010221024947.A7139@rouge.snu.ac.kr> <3A937839.697D60A2@gottinger.de> <20010221195604.B9090@rouge.snu.ac.kr> <3A939E66.489E136E@gottinger.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <3A939E66.489E136E@gottinger.de>; from 320095285153-0001@t-online.de on Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 11:54:30AM +0100
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
Date: Wed Feb 21 04:44:02 2001
X-Original-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 20:44:44 +0900
X-Archives-Salt: fb6467f5-51f3-468b-b8b3-c2f1a0638338
X-Archives-Hash: 827e24aae3e01b3032be553392b1d703

> > After merging binutils-2.10.1.0.7 and everything gose beautifully.
> > But merging glibc-2.2.2, nothing would go its way.
> > 
> > Do you mean that packages must be recompiled under glibc-2.2.2 and
> > updated binutils environment?
> No normaly that should not be neccesary.
> 
> It seems that the problem is arch dependend.
> 
> I use i686-pc-linux-gnu here. The rc4_pre2 packages use
> i486-pc-linux-gnu
> as default.
> 
> I currently building glibc-2.2.2-r1 with binutils-2.10.92.0.2 on a pure
> rc4_pre2 machine. I hope that works.
> 
> Did the glibc test's fail on your machine when using binutils 2.10.1?

Yes. :)

> On a i686 target they do.

Kyunghwan