From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,
	DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN,DMARC_NONE,INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0
Received: from rouge.snu.ac.kr ([147.46.102.25])
	by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1)
	id 14VGuQ-0003Ot-00
	for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:49:07 -0700
Received: (from redjade@localhost)
	by rouge.snu.ac.kr (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f1KHnlL07147
	for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 02:49:47 +0900 (KST)
From: Kyung-hwan Kim <redjade@rouge.snu.ac.kr>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.2.2 / binutils-2.1.10.0.7 are incompatible/buggy!!!!! Don't use them on rc4_pre
Message-ID: <20010221024947.A7139@rouge.snu.ac.kr>
References: <3A90BA1F.5C3183BD@gottinger.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <3A90BA1F.5C3183BD@gottinger.de>; from 320095285153-0001@t-online.de on Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 07:15:59AM +0100
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
Date: Tue Feb 20 10:50:02 2001
X-Original-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 02:49:47 +0900
X-Archives-Salt: b8e3e527-9e2a-4f73-beb5-277c27ec7621
X-Archives-Hash: 15af4811a691cfff22eecd41a633bf70

On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 07:15:59AM +0100, Achim Gottinger wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> During compilation here I found that latest binutils segfault's during
> linking of mpeg2_movie so it seems to be abit buggy.
> 
> With Glibc-2.2.2 some packages like daemontools/pam needs to be patched
> to compile since there where some so
> called header cleanups done in this release.
> 
> Please use glibc-2.2.1 and binutils-2.1.10 until I have updated all
> packages that needs patching.

I merged glibc-2.2.2 two days ago.
Files including ls, make, tar... got segmentation fault and failed.

Is there any dependence about glibc?
Or safe way to test new glibc/binutils and packages which is dependent
on them?

Kyunghwan Kim