From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24, INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NO_RELAYS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from pete by cvs.gentoo.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1) id 14VK6s-0003zk-00 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 14:14:10 -0700 From: Pete Gavin To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20010220141409.A18923@cvs.gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Subject: [gentoo-dev] X11 dependencies Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Feb 20 14:15:01 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 14:14:10 -0700 X-Archives-Salt: b98961ab-38c2-403d-bc1f-f3bd69a5e2e0 X-Archives-Hash: 3d827bd2065093de7fd533b9372685a6 Hi, I was wondering, perhaps we should make XFree86 provide virtual/x11, and then make packages that just require x11 depend on virtual/x11. That way, if one day gentoo is supported on platforms that dont use xfree86 (like just the regular X consortium version) we won't have to change a bunch of other stuff. Other packages that require XFree86 extensions (like DRI or whatnot) could depend on Xfree86 specifically. What do you think? Pete