From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24, INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NO_RELAYS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from drobbins by cvs.gentoo.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1) id 14QFsQ-00006c-00 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2001 14:42:18 -0700 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc build problem in make check Message-ID: <20010206144218.A326@cvs.gentoo.org> References: <20010206142311.C27279@cvs.gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010206142311.C27279@cvs.gentoo.org>; from pete@gentoo.org on Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 02:23:11PM -0700 From: Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Feb 6 14:43:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 14:42:18 -0700 X-Archives-Salt: ec8143fe-eed1-417d-b4a6-2e6326fea453 X-Archives-Hash: cf0b668788ef01b20e444b6797858017 On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 02:23:11PM -0700, Pete Gavin wrote: > Hi, > > I tried building glibc-2.2.1 again, this time under linux-2.4.0.11-r3, > to see if the problem was related to a reiserfs problem in the > kernel. I got the same error that I got under linux-2.4.1-pre8. This > happened under the make check stage of the build. Do you know anything > about this, Achim? > > > GCONV_PATH=/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.1/work/glibc-2.2.1/buildhere/iconvdata LC_ALL=C /tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.1/work/glibc-2.2.1/buildhere/elf/ld-linux.so.2 --library-path /tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.1/work/glibc-2.2.1/buildhere:/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.1/work/glibc-2.2.1/work/glibc-2.2.1/buildhere/math:/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.1/work/glibc-2.2.1/buildhere/elf:/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.1/work/glibc-2.2.1/buildhere/dlfcn:/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.1/work/glibc-2.2.1/buildhere/nss:/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.1/work/glibc-2.2.1/buidhere/nis:/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.1/work/glibc-2.2.1/buildhere/rt:/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.1/work/glibc-2.2.1/buildhere/resolv:/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.1/work/glibc-2.2.1/buildhere/crypt:/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.1/work/glibc-2.2.1/buildhere/linuxthreads /tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.1/work/glibc-2.2.1/buildhere/io/test-lfs > /tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.1/work/glibc-2.2.1/buildhere/io/test-lfs.out > Timed out: killed the child process > make[2]: *** [/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.1/work/glibc-2.2.1/buildhere/io/test-lfs.out] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.1/work/glibc-2.2.1/io' > make[1]: *** [io/tests] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.1/work/glibc-2.2.1' > make: *** [check] Error 2 I did a google search, and found that another person had that same problem but with kernel 2.2.17. I don't think it's a kernel issue. It's either a problem with glibc or binutils. In a response, Andreas of SuSE says: Update to newer binutils, 2.10.1 should be ok. Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger SuSE Labs aj@suse.de private aj@arthur.inka.de http://www.suse.de/~aj So maybe we're dealing with a buggy binutils? It's happened before. -- Daniel Robbins President/CEO http://www.gentoo.org Gentoo Technologies, Inc.