From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,
	INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NO_RELAYS autolearn=no
	autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0
Received: from pete by cvs.gentoo.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1)
	id 14PvD5-0003nW-00
	for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2001 16:38:15 -0700
From: Pete Gavin <pete@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] allowing configuration of builds?
Message-ID: <20010205163815.D13748@cvs.gentoo.org>
References: <20010205144208.D11667@cvs.gentoo.org> <3A7F2375.3713598F@gottinger.de> <20010205153657.A13748@cvs.gentoo.org> <3A7F27BF.43961400@gottinger.de> <20010205160141.B13748@cvs.gentoo.org> <3A7F31EA.D7639196@gottinger.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <3A7F31EA.D7639196@gottinger.de>; from 320095285153-0001@t-online.de on Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 12:06:19AM +0100
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
Date: Mon Feb  5 16:39:02 2001
X-Original-Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 16:38:15 -0700
X-Archives-Salt: 12c0dc74-c870-45d0-bd13-4443c8250f87
X-Archives-Hash: b9036f72cfd9a98fa93621d3422b01e8

On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 12:06:19AM +0100, Achim Gottinger wrote:
> So it is more definatly a kernel/reiserfs  problem. Things work better with
> 2.4.0-ac11.
> 
> What do you think about that temporary solution for the kernel configuration.
> 
> if [ "${LOPCAL_KERNEL_CONFIG}" == "interactive" ]
> then
>     make menuconfig
> else
>     if [ "${LOCAL_KERNEL_CONFIG}" ]
>     then
>         cp ${LOCAL_KERNEL_CONFIG} .config
>      else
>         cp ${FILESDIR}...../config .config
>      fi
>      yes "" | make oldconfig
> fi
> 
> This way you can eigther pass your own config file or use the interactive
> method.
> If the var is not set it behaves as before.
> 
> achim
> 

Well, I've done a simple addition to the current ebuild script that will
set INTERACTIVE=y in the .ebuild file if it is passed w/ the -i switch.
I put it in sys-apps/portage/files/ebuild-pete. I'll also attach a
linux kernel ebuild script I put together to take advantage of this...

I'll email it to you separately from this message.

Pete