From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24, INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NO_RELAYS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: by cvs.gentoo.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E17AC52E45; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 09:52:52 -0700 (MST) From: drobbins@gentoo.org To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Tom Message-ID: <20010125095252.B11906@cvs.gentoo.org> References: <20010125125423.B24460@tsuny.ctn.cogs.susx.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from egabriel@io.com on Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 07:05:05AM -0600 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Jan 25 09:53:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 09:52:52 -0700 X-Archives-Salt: d2d5e170-cd8f-4217-bd49-78d84623c203 X-Archives-Hash: 66e660718cd01730224047a304d28899 On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 07:05:05AM -0600, Gabriel wrote: > Yeah, everyone has an idea, but y'all are doing the work :) I do have a thought > though. I got Debian Hurd running a couple of weeks ago, and it has come a long > way. With the next iso bundle (Hurd-E1), I really think there could be a > foundation for the first non-debian hurd release. Gentoo would be perfect. > Especially if the base system only included FSF software. That's another > thing I'd be interested in playing with. A question -- could you give us a quick overview of the differences between HURD and the Linux kernel? I'm curious about what new things HURD offers. Best Regards, -- Daniel Robbins President/CEO http://www.gentoo.org Gentoo Technologies, Inc.