From: Jerry A! <jerry@thehutt.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild, ip6tables headaches, kernel confusion, xinetd vs. tcpwrappers
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 03:13:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010110031306.A6956@kabbu.akopia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000f01c07ada$b31486e0$0701a8c0@rayuela>; from zielot@thebestisp.com on Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 01:55:24AM -0600
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 01:55:24AM -0600, Justin Vander Ziel wrote:
: Hello folks.
:
: 1. I managed to revise the iptables-1.1.2.ebuild script to handle
: iptables-1.2 -- and it worked! That is, except for one small problem: I
: forgot to build a package list for ebuild and BTW, how do I do this?
That's the nifty thing about the portage system--it takes care of
creating the packing list.
: 2. the ebuild script chokes on versions such as in autofs-4.0.0-pre9.tar.bz2
: (with accompanying ebuild file) -- when I do
:
: # ebuild autofs-4.0.0-pre9.ebuild merge
That's not a valid name for an ebuild. Try something like
"autofs-4.0.0_p9.ebuild". Then in the ebuild, explicitly set $P to the
package name to use (eg "P=autofs-4.0.0-pre9")
: 4. kernel confusion
: When all is said and done why not just go with 2.4.0 stable? My neophyte
: logic says that if it's a final kernel release that has been blessed by
: Linus than at the very least, it must be more stable than the 2.3.X series
: or the 2.4.0-testX series (I don't know where the ac1/2/3 fit into this).
Ahh, grasshopper. When many release cycles you've been through, trust a
point-oh release you will not.
: 5. xinetd vs. tcpwrappers (a.k.a tcpd)
: OK, xinetd already provides the services of tcpwrappers so why would you
: want to install both by default as it is implied on the Gentoo home page?
Choice. Some applications (like exim and I think sudo) have intrinsic
support for tcpwrappers. These are a few other services (that I can't
think of off the top of my head). Anyway, lots of daemonizing services
have support for tcpwrappers. Some people find the syntax of
/etc/hosts.allow for the one or two services they run, to be a lot
simplier than setting up firewall rules.
: 6. app suggestions
: I haven't seen a master plan/list regarding what get's included in the
: production release -- although I do think that it should be limited to one
: CD -- AT MOST. IMHO there is definitely such a thing as too many apps. The
I agree. Just so long as the apps are the ones that I want. 8)
: 9. Nifty cd package label in ps if your interested.
: I spent a little time in Photoshop LE (I don't have $600 smackers to pay for
: the real thing!) and whipped this up. I think it's attractive but it's not
: exactly 'production quality'. Anyways if you want a copy I'll send you a
: postscript file with the cd label and jacket for gentoo 1.0 rc3
Hey, I'd dig a copy of that.
--Jerry
name: Jerry Alexandratos || Open-Source software isn't a
phone: 703.599.6023 || matter of life or death...
email: jerry@akopia.com || ...It's much more important
|| than that!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-10 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20010108190102.65304328A2@cvs.gentoo.org>
2001-01-10 7:55 ` [gentoo-dev] ebuild, ip6tables headaches, kernel confusion, xinetd vs. tcpwrappers Justin Vander Ziel
2001-01-10 8:13 ` Jerry A! [this message]
2001-01-10 8:27 ` Thomas Flavel
2001-01-10 9:21 ` [gentoo-dev] ebuild, ip6tables headaches, kernel confusion,xinetd " Achim Gottinger
2001-01-10 10:55 ` [gentoo-dev] mission critical changes 8) (was: ebuild, ip6tables headaches, kernel confusion, xinetd vs. tcpwrappers) Morgan Christiansson
2001-01-10 11:17 ` Thomas Flavel
2001-01-10 11:57 ` Morgan Christiansson
2001-01-10 17:23 ` [gentoo-dev] no more long subject lines! :) drobbins
2001-01-10 17:06 ` [gentoo-dev] boot pretty drobbins
2001-01-10 20:47 ` Morgan Christiansson
2001-01-10 23:16 ` [gentoo-dev] Installation frontend Thomas Flavel
2001-01-10 23:29 ` drobbins
2001-01-10 14:56 ` [gentoo-dev] ebuild, ip6tables headaches, kernel confusion, xinetd vs. tcpwrappers drobbins
2001-01-10 8:57 ` Bill Anderson
2001-01-10 9:17 ` Jerry A!
2001-01-10 15:06 ` drobbins
2001-01-10 10:06 ` Achim Gottinger
2001-01-10 15:12 ` drobbins
2001-01-10 17:40 ` Bill Anderson
2001-01-10 17:57 ` drobbins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010110031306.A6956@kabbu.akopia.com \
--to=jerry@thehutt.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox