From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50A413828B for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 17:14:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E54723400B; Fri, 27 May 2016 17:14:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 275D121C012 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 17:14:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from greysprite.dite (cpe-74-77-145-97.buffalo.res.rr.com [74.77.145.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: blueness) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E480340CC3 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 17:14:21 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] gtk/gtk2/gtk3 USE flag situation To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1464358866.13834.59.camel@gentoo.org> From: "Anthony G. Basile" Message-ID: <1e38b9eb-268b-30ca-d29e-060ffdb1db97@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 13:14:17 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: f0e83936-af91-4ecd-9ba4-e6933441a3fd X-Archives-Hash: 0ed05a52a59de570191a2ecad9198037 On 5/27/16 12:59 PM, rindeal wrote: > On 27 May 2016 at 18:54, landis blackwell wrote: >> I stopped reading after you reminded me it was 2016 > > Good to know, thanks for stopping by. > Yeah the "its year" meme has been making its rounds of the internet. anyhow, my 2017 question is about avahi. right now i have USE=gtk and gtk3, where gtk really means gtk2. i'm not going to change that because it fits QA's specs. but i could remove it altogether and just drop gtk2 support for the next release. good idea? bad idea? i guess i'm asking whats the status of gtk2 in gentoo seeing as its dead upstream. -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail : blueness@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA