From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lby3E-0000pS-Pt for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:14:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FBD6E031E; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:14:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gx0-f175.google.com (mail-gx0-f175.google.com [209.85.217.175]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780CFE031E for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:14:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk23 with SMTP id 23so7359913gxk.10 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:14:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=PkBamix+8NIC7eH1ZdMjMTnkSMH8vVvD00Kk5RGsS4Q=; b=a/vi83KvUK8CULxB4bSQmCSzca/x44rKvY+2SMG8OvJfChiGLqvKEfkMiVIM5fTjGY FzwDniN/Y42dq83ed3VS7gyTFqp7o+3fqQdQqpEY8ZSBdk6tBhLloOiqfDfPsSExUbBw +su6rwAqse1i3YzdEpEIVdluraI5S1U33MWEQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=OldaW+q7f9nq+cuLNOBwDiOul17Uz9QgnfUyqx78ryD/4IOWraGOmZiB9uooyEiyuE Cb/RlQFrbIWxnljaMzOrQK9a2XLFfmv7w0X5NwWGYZRAxiixaKtpoGrndGXf100C1QoF d53sjgBI47cNOFH23RXE010Dzp4mw8ApW4x0s= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: serkankabagentoo@gmail.com Received: by 10.220.75.19 with SMTP id w19mr787282vcj.110.1235484861997; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:14:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1235483708.23500.60.camel@liasis.inforead.com> References: <1234257125.18160.2016.camel@localhost> <49A2B276.1000109@gentoo.org> <49A2C40D.3060601@gentoo.org> <20090223132202.1cd1337e@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca> <49A30C3F.2030209@gentoo.org> <20090223205438.0349f967@snowcone> <20090223161525.458b78e2@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca> <20090223221915.108441bd@snowcone> <1235483708.23500.60.camel@liasis.inforead.com> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:14:21 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4d997b39c03be985 Message-ID: <1c3d94820902240614w67b15425v64893808dda793b1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009) From: Serkan Kaba To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e647ecfc53249b0463aabc21 X-Archives-Salt: 98f0c98a-7723-4a36-b8ee-80441ab48889 X-Archives-Hash: b90d17e796ac14cbe19ccf68b166f371 --0016e647ecfc53249b0463aabc21 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 2009/2/24 Ferris McCormick > On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 22:19 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:15:25 -0600 > > Ryan Hill wrote: > > > Can we ban eclasses from setting EAPI? Is there any case where it > > > would be sane? > > > > It's already banned from a QA perspective, but from a package manager > > perspective people have done it in the past and possibly still do do > > it, and the spec doesn't forbid it. > > > > For what it's worth, no eclass in the gentoo-x86/eclass tree sets EAPI. > I don't know about anyplace else. > > Regards, > Ferris > -- > Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) > Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees) > lucene-contrib eclass in java-experimental [1] sets EAPI to 1 to use slot deps. And I think that's a valid usage. 1: http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/java/browser/java-experimental/eclass/lucene-contrib.eclass --0016e647ecfc53249b0463aabc21 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2009/2/24 Ferris McCormick <= ;fmccor@gentoo.org>
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 2= 04, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 22:19 +0000, Ci= aran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:15:25 -0600
> Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo= .org> wrote:
> > Can we ban eclasses from setting EAPI? =A0Is there any case where= it
> > would be sane?
>
> It's already banned from a QA perspective, but from a package mana= ger
> perspective people have done it in the past and possibly still do do > it, and the spec doesn't forbid it.
>

For what it's worth, no eclass in the gentoo-x86/eclass tre= e sets EAPI.
I don't know about anyplace else.

Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmcc= or@gentoo.org>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
lucene-contrib eclass in java-experimental [1] se= ts EAPI to 1 to use slot deps. And I think that's a valid usage.
1: http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/java/brows= er/java-experimental/eclass/lucene-contrib.eclass
--0016e647ecfc53249b0463aabc21--