From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-50300-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1S7HYa-0006vg-Lc for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 02:33:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BE51E0C37; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 02:33:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 641EDE0977 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 02:33:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.77] (dsl-67-230-137-32.tor.primus.ca [67.230.137.32]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: axs) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 912841B4006 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 02:33:11 +0000 (UTC) References: <20120311022706.GA26296@linux1> <CAGfcS_nj8=1grGw6C4K8yFoJeUg0PiycbxiWOhbgS=vYQDgYbg@mail.gmail.com> <4F5C1BE9.3040609@gentoo.org> <20120311173355.GB6599@linux1> <4F5EA152.80604@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4F5EA152.80604@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <1F113AE5-F916-4F24-A4A3-5C142CC77438@gentoo.org> Cc: "gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org" <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9A405) From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Let's redesign the entire filesystem! [was newsitem: unmasking udev-181] Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:33:02 -0400 To: "gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org" <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 167bc40c-6a15-4956-ad48-93beaeff7bf1 X-Archives-Hash: dc826c142f7d0fc82d5dc22bb7397199 On 2012-03-12, at 9:22 PM, Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org> wrote: >=20 > And yes, I've already tested out udev-181 on a VM with a > separate /usr. With devtmpfs, the system fully boots just fine, no > initramfs needed. Guess what the only piece of software to mess up is? > Udev. I largely think it's a timing issue in OpenRC, however, because /us= r > DOES get mounted fairly quickly, but not before udevd starts. But udevd > does restart itself and everything looks to work fine. If you aren't > watching the terminal, you wouldn't even notice the failures. >=20 THANK YOU for testing this -- I could not forsee a reason, back when this pr= ocess started, as to why openrc couldn't mount /usr before udev started. s= ince devtmpfs should provide the source devnode anyways. It's good to have a= (near) proof of that. Ian