From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Iqfjt-00081H-BH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 02:06:25 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lAA25VsX026621; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 02:05:31 GMT Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lAA23IKq023778 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 02:03:19 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost-12225.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6290CBE723 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 03:03:18 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 12224) with ESMTP id ZzS-qIctMAOa 03585-15; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 03:03:17 +0100 (MET) 13669 Received: from [192.168.1.10] (i59F75CF7.versanet.de [89.247.92.247]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: buchholz) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 03:03:17 +0100 (MET) In-Reply-To: <1194440992.2705.96.camel@liasis.inforead.com> References: <1194440992.2705.96.camel@liasis.inforead.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) X-Gpgmail-State: !signed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <19F48F64-7A56-4278-9C9B-6B3F481F7194@gentoo.org> Cc: Gentoo Developers Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Robert Buchholz Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: USE flag transition: tetex and latex Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 03:03:17 +0100 To: Ferris McCormick X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de (including SpamAssassin) X-Archives-Salt: e5ed9cf8-c3b2-417a-9ca7-b4bfe18cac4e X-Archives-Hash: 49d82a19ff1e2146ec727201dc467c1c Am 07.11.2007 um 14:09 schrieb Ferris McCormick: > On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 09:13 +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> Yes, we should introduce tex, latex and kpathsea USE flags. >>> Anyone? >> >> +1 for latex & kpathsea. How/when do we start ? :) I'd say start >> moving >> useflags on a per package basis, making them local for now. Once >> there >> are enough, let us move to a global one. Once this is finished, >> let us >> deprecate the tetex useflag. >> >> +0.5 for tex: it's a good idea, but I dont know about any package >> using >> only tex and not latex (and where it would be optional). Perhaps I'm >> wrong there. >> > > I don't think documentation using texinfo.tex (the documentation that > comes in .texi files) uses latex --- I believe that texinfo.tex uses > just plain tex. Do we even provide plain tex via an ebuild or useflag? If not, why bother to differentiate? Robert -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list