From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QMxT5-0002iW-0K for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 19 May 2011 07:16:23 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E1EE1C0FF; Thu, 19 May 2011 07:16:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8951C0C7 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 07:15:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) by a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p4J7Fe6T025831; Thu, 19 May 2011 09:15:40 +0200 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.4/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p4J7Fejw014367; Thu, 19 May 2011 09:15:40 +0200 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p4J7FeQv014366; Thu, 19 May 2011 09:15:40 +0200 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19924.50076.202838.866032@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 09:15:40 +0200 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: pr@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of kdeprefix news item In-Reply-To: References: <3492806.SC9FXRJr6n@jonathan-laptop> <19924.49067.318264.52433@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> X-Mailer: VM 8.1.1 under 23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 97fd9832eba392a8aa37d1583175c109 >>>>> On Thu, 19 May 2011, Alec Warner wrote: > You should file a bug about that; I'm sure one of the portage guys > can change the crap code I wrote 4 years ago to use the normal > dependency checking code for installed atoms. But we wouldn't know if users have the updated portage version installed, so it doesn't help for the current news item. I think for a proper solution we would have to increase the number of the News-Item-Format. Maybe even add a new header field for the EAPI. Ulrich