From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FDmeM-0005YK-Lo for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:59:11 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1RHvpXp028234; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:57:51 GMT Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz (gw.top-hosting.cz [81.0.254.91]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1RHsP6r017386 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:54:25 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA216A890EE for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:54:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.top-hosting.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 12938-04 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:54:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from NOTORCOMP (21.217.broadband4.iol.cz [85.71.217.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956E0A7B45B for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:54:16 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:54:13 +0100 From: Jakub Moc X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <194427272.20060227185413@gentoo.org> To: Ciaran McCreesh Subject: Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] bug #20201 and bbapm In-Reply-To: <20060227172309.17c1e7d5@snowdrop.home> References: <440333A1.2030808@gentoo.org> <20060227172309.17c1e7d5@snowdrop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="----------10310C732989470D" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.3.3 (20050822) at top-hosting.cz X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.957 tagged_above=-999 required=6 tests=[AWL=0.642, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -1.957 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 9bc26089-8358-4f8f-8c67-7e61f466d541 X-Archives-Hash: 360f95512d64a361b2c356bedae67f6d ------------10310C732989470D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0D=0A27.2.2006, 18:23:09, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:15:13 -0500 Alec Warner > wrote: > | bbapm has been masked due to no one responding with anything useful to > | last rites e-mail. It will be punted in 30 days. > No no no. Do this properly. Clean up *all* the broken blackbox applets, > not just the one that has someone whining on a bug report. There are at > least two in the tree that're more broken than this. *Please*, be so kind and look at metadata.xml for those ebuild, then just either do it *yourself* or ask someone from your fellow-devs in commonbox herd to do it for the other ebuilds that you failed to mention above... Don't move broken stuff on other people's shoulders, as you've already done once. I fail to see why are you claiming here that there's even more broken stuff in the tree, yet as a member of maintainer herd haven't dealt with that properly for quite an extensive period of time - and then you are asking *other* people to do something "properly". The fact that there are other ebuilds broken as well isn't any valid reason for keeping this particular broken thing on portage. That way, nothing would be punted from portage, ever. TIA. --=20 Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:jakub@gentoo.org GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0= xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;) ------------10310C732989470D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) iD8DBQFEAzzFhxfV/c66PZ4RAlNwAJ46Sadm0bjoHop/oyFCFxYxK2mz+wCfR6Yf kcK+FWgUnfrbPx1QpLpGm/U= =hDdR -----END PGP MESSAGE----- ------------10310C732989470D-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list