1.11.2005, 18:40:35, Carsten Lohrke wrote:

> On Tuesday 01 November 2005 18:11, Jakub Moc wrote:
>> OK, lets remove perl.

> Such a reply is not an argument, but pointless. As you know as well, Perl is 
> not exactly something other packages do not depend on.

As already stated by Flameeyes, we could produce a list of hundreds of ebuilds to remove,
just because they are unmaintained. So, let's start alphabetically:

   app-arch/arc
   app-arch/lha
   app-arch/pdv
   app-arch/rpm
   app-arch/upm
   app-arch/upx
   app-arch/zip
   app-arch/dump
   app-arch/lzop
   app-arch/gtk-splitter
   app-arch/mscompress
   app-arch/cksfv
   app-arch/tardy
   app-arch/unace
   app-arch/unarj
   app-arch/bsdsfv
   app-arch/stuffit
   app-arch/guitar
   app-arch/upx-ucl

Good luck with that approach... :)

OK, if someone wants some starting point that makes at least some sense, see
http://tinyurl.com/bbvxs which lists open bugs assigned to maintainer-needed
that are not enhancement/version bump.
   
-- 
Best regards,

 Jakub Moc
 mailto:jakub@gentoo.org
 GPG signature: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95  B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E

 ... still no signature ;)