From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NmXb3-0008Mn-GS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:17:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A6BEDE0E88; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 19:17:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02377E0E7E for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 19:17:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) by a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.0/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o22JHHpB010555 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 20:17:18 +0100 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o22JHHfX015427; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 20:17:17 +0100 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o22JHHUW015424; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 20:17:17 +0100 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19341.25661.876659.838226@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 20:17:17 +0100 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Marking bugs for bugday? In-Reply-To: <4B8D6229.1090402@gentoo.org> References: <4B889D1F.3040304@gentoo.org> <201002282154.35130.hwoarang@gentoo.org> <4B8ACC34.7000600@gentoo.org> <20100228173504.78eea0b1@angelstorm> <20100302010205.18765d7s0e4x781s@webmail.df.eu> <4B8D6229.1090402@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: VM 8.1.0-beta under 23.1.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller X-Archives-Salt: d07bac5f-3f4a-4171-8915-efa24e9d34ce X-Archives-Hash: 91033f5a95325d8552aabcca2788a19b >>>>> On Tue, 02 Mar 2010, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > To make naming a bit more consistent, how about: > - BUGDAY-CANDIDATE > - BUGDAY-ACCEPTED > - BUGDAY-REFUSED > They're a bit long but I think it's worth to not have them crippled > down to stuff like "BDYES", "BDNO" and "BDMAYBE". This looks like overkill to me. One keyword should be enough, and for supplementary information "Status Whiteboard" could be used. Ulrich