From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NkMzY-0002Rx-1K for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:33:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 065ACE0E0B; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F61E0DCD for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:33:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) by a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.0/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o1OJXbUQ029290 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:33:37 +0100 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o1OJXbPJ002949; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:33:37 +0100 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o1OJXbUt002946; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:33:37 +0100 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19333.32529.795772.569071@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:33:37 +0100 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes to make_desktop_entry in eutils.eclass In-Reply-To: <1267037706.28599.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <4B848035.7000703@gentoo.org> <1267035377.28599.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <19333.29360.489642.238451@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <1267037706.28599.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: VM 8.1.0-beta under 23.1.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller X-Archives-Salt: b0561e63-8478-4381-a6a9-a241d61e744a X-Archives-Hash: f4fc088bb744f7f33d845707356d1113 >>>>> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> Why should "Science" be a sub-category of "Education"? >> That doesn't make sense to me. > I agree with you bad, sadly, spec states it's a sub-category: > http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html Where does it say that Science is a sub-category of Education? It only says: "Additional Categories should always be used in combination with *one*of*the Main Categories." and "The Related Categories column lists one or more categories that are *suggested* to be used in conjunction with the Additional Category." (my emphasis) > and, for now, we need to use "Education,Science" if we don't want to > see that menu entries showing up in "Others" menu :-(. I don't think that using another main category together with Science is forbidden. > This bug is interesting, but I don't think it will be fixed soon :-/ > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20186 So they are aware that their classification is stupid. ;-) Ulrich