From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F12EB139694 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 10:44:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A2C7FE0ED0; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 10:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo6-p04-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo6-p04-ob.smtp.rzone.de [IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:5304::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3746FE0ECB for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 10:44:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1501238665; l=1911; s=domk; d=akhuettel.de; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To: From; bh=L1qAF1GJ6Dut3QY7OjAy+BT3Xq1pQpRCDvUkcAJXg1M=; b=sUwxuQl0eYvxek81EQbbv8wNTEf9OBBcq1iPguiCLSLxd8Pyj2iikEI4kTP1kVL4in J5CIMiK7VTeGB7IfoX4bS511XPUEps9PcCsyAHrsfFaq+HVFl+57tOO+OhAytECpnf7e aFXC3gNO8hPvRCSUE6aP+qL8ttogUojMU5Tzw= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo04 X-RZG-AUTH: :IW0NeWCpcPchHrcnS4ebzBgQnKHTmUiSF2JlOcy7/4i/LfK0HEnQHvj8Yvw= Received: from porto.localnet ([118.70.183.132]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 41.1 SBL|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id z06ce2t6SAiPRVF (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (curve secp521r1 with 521 ECDH bits, eq. 15360 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate) for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 12:44:25 +0200 (CEST) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts? Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 12:44:20 +0200 Message-ID: <1931696.H1tAJ0QB7a@porto> Organization: Gentoo Linux In-Reply-To: <20170724232244.GT12397@stuge.se> References: <20170724222223.6d359e47@sf> <20170724232244.GT12397@stuge.se> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1641277.57QA3n1S1X"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 79819d80-ab68-47c7-a139-3901dc6f8edf X-Archives-Hash: 0dd69148525b8d8d1a20964fc43b0439 --nextPart1641277.57QA3n1S1X Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Am Dienstag, 25. Juli 2017, 01:22:44 CEST schrieb Peter Stuge: >=20 > I hold a perhaps radical view: I would like to simply remove stable. >=20 > I continue to feel that maintaining two worlds (stable+unstable) > carries with it an unneccessary cost. >=20 That's not feasible. It would kill off any semi-professional or professiona= l=20 Gentoo use, where a minimum of stability is required.=20 (Try keeping ~10 machines on stable running without automation. That's alre= ady=20 quite some work. Now try the same with ~arch. Now imagine you're talking ab= out=20 100 or 1000 machines.) =2D-=20 Andreas K. H=FCttel dilfridge@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice) --nextPart1641277.57QA3n1S1X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEJA5qH5IRj7fTL1RCdGtqHaygwr4FAll7FYQACgkQdGtqHayg wr4Bnw//U9x4GMb1qRLcs5pkOjg2abL4+egaZgH802OvAp0Ayl8SClG5LO3M77fk UW+AmVMbHzFw2FG2ELIyUC1ch+gkIGZD7SbPoOdzGBnqoirifh/mV7aC7xci6yhr DBuer29rgcwwPZc2NNlkGcs4H38dU6Hw1nlSxg4zGl6Uj6DQHfDxKQF5qpgTIdjm JTIP6Nm8BR3iviHejIUhb1qqhghyknRpDh1KF/ucdlC9qpayBr1B2On22VlGFV9Y 7F2SxPANXDM9ORwi1rmwrohReyo16XO7YA0hSTCsFNSu42Si4OunH1zrwvExao10 VUIP3+gAvmmjZ25IM8bO7QZZB76AVENvzhNFxh0M+OD0NWMQHoE68kl0lNZumJHo u0tJqAmtfaoVGAZwjOWLdLqP5GYxEnx2Y7csaISemsH6q3Hp0MOHOyNpt85r+M/c g/VyWRpkIdIlWmIZIKV18x4AfPWPQNis5KqOwJLYv4KMTNSSEqV8acK+JnzISA53 1wc7EVOVWH+f1MPAzMWymJkOfDUOxUlbuWY4CN5ib1vsQ+4H3oY4d+3xjqzpGiy1 ARFHY+6Vhc+2VA1cvpnxZMuDcgRjFWSGlhhYH48p3LphZztjsHmrV8lSjH+Zk2Dd YwK3M/BmeuvgaKTe5qYXarxUB7WmGQOUJ9ZfuGLav4EgLVpqOzE= =9kBH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1641277.57QA3n1S1X--