public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: Florian Schmaus <flow@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Update on the 23.0 profiles
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 14:32:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1930520.taCxCBeP46@pinacolada> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c7386cc8-34c3-4b9b-8033-59252a19df75@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 878 bytes --]

> > Most 17.x profiles have been downgraded to "exp".
> 
> I could imagine there is a reason to downgrade those back to 'exp', 
> could you elaborate a bit on that?
> 
> Isn't it bit strange that a 'stable' profiles gets downgraded back to 
> 'exp'? Then again, I am not sure about the implications of this nor 
> about the rationale behind it.

Mostly so the load on the CI does not suddenly double. 

There's no real reason why we can't keep a few of the profiles stable.
Also not much reason to do that though...

> 
> However, I also notice that there is a outstanding PR that reverts that 
> [1]. Maybe we should introduce a new state 'oldstable' or so?
> 
> - Flow
> 
> 
> 1: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/35871
> 


-- 
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfridge@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer
(council, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice)

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 981 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-07 12:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-06 15:06 [gentoo-dev] Update on the 23.0 profiles Andreas K. Huettel
2024-04-07  2:03 ` Michael Orlitzky
2024-04-07 12:35   ` Andreas K. Huettel
2024-04-07 12:51     ` Michael Orlitzky
2024-04-07 13:07       ` Andreas K. Huettel
2024-04-08  6:40         ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2024-04-08 12:00         ` [gentoo-dev] " Michael Orlitzky
2024-04-08 15:16           ` Eddie Chapman
2024-04-07 14:48       ` Michał Górny
2024-04-07 21:09         ` Michael Orlitzky
2024-04-08  0:22           ` Alex Boag-Munroe
2024-04-08  3:07             ` Michał Górny
2024-04-07 11:35 ` Florian Schmaus
2024-04-07 12:31   ` [gentoo-dev] " Madhu
2024-04-07 13:27     ` Andreas K. Huettel
2024-04-11 16:37       ` [gentoo-dev] " Madhu
2024-04-07 12:32   ` Andreas K. Huettel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1930520.taCxCBeP46@pinacolada \
    --to=dilfridge@gentoo.org \
    --cc=flow@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox