From: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: Florian Schmaus <flow@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Update on the 23.0 profiles
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 14:32:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1930520.taCxCBeP46@pinacolada> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c7386cc8-34c3-4b9b-8033-59252a19df75@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 878 bytes --]
> > Most 17.x profiles have been downgraded to "exp".
>
> I could imagine there is a reason to downgrade those back to 'exp',
> could you elaborate a bit on that?
>
> Isn't it bit strange that a 'stable' profiles gets downgraded back to
> 'exp'? Then again, I am not sure about the implications of this nor
> about the rationale behind it.
Mostly so the load on the CI does not suddenly double.
There's no real reason why we can't keep a few of the profiles stable.
Also not much reason to do that though...
>
> However, I also notice that there is a outstanding PR that reverts that
> [1]. Maybe we should introduce a new state 'oldstable' or so?
>
> - Flow
>
>
> 1: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/35871
>
--
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfridge@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer
(council, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice)
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 981 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-07 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-06 15:06 [gentoo-dev] Update on the 23.0 profiles Andreas K. Huettel
2024-04-07 2:03 ` Michael Orlitzky
2024-04-07 12:35 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2024-04-07 12:51 ` Michael Orlitzky
2024-04-07 13:07 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2024-04-08 6:40 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2024-04-08 12:00 ` [gentoo-dev] " Michael Orlitzky
2024-04-08 15:16 ` Eddie Chapman
2024-04-07 14:48 ` Michał Górny
2024-04-07 21:09 ` Michael Orlitzky
2024-04-08 0:22 ` Alex Boag-Munroe
2024-04-08 3:07 ` Michał Górny
2024-04-07 11:35 ` Florian Schmaus
2024-04-07 12:31 ` [gentoo-dev] " Madhu
2024-04-07 13:27 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2024-04-11 16:37 ` [gentoo-dev] " Madhu
2024-04-07 12:32 ` Andreas K. Huettel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1930520.taCxCBeP46@pinacolada \
--to=dilfridge@gentoo.org \
--cc=flow@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox