From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] mtime preservation
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:07:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19214.17755.627908.131978@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19214.13680.288961.629420@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
>>>>> On Thu, 26 Nov 2009, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Zac Medico wrote:
>> Of the known packages which require timestamp preservation, do any
>> of them use sub-second precision in their timestamp comparisons?
> I can speak for Emacs only, where the comparison code (in fileio.c) is
> as follows: [...]
> It uses stat(2), therefore nanoseconds are ignored.
I've also checked with dev-lisp/sbcl and dev-lisp/cmucl. They use
stat(2) or fstat(2), i.e. compare timestamps on the seconds level.
Ulrich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-26 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <19184.25176.380022.392451@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
[not found] ` <19186.42949.760878.199957@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
[not found] ` <20091108191439.3fcee79d@snowcone>
[not found] ` <7c612fc60911090718y144319f5lc9827a5e2e153c2@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20091109153429.502e272f@snowcone>
[not found] ` <19193.4389.637969.727075@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
[not found] ` <20091119221248.539eedd9@snowmobile>
[not found] ` <7c612fc60911191614h5e37c849y50ad217a828fa744@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20091120001820.7274bdf7@snowmobile>
[not found] ` <4B07362D.2010108@gentoo.org>
2009-11-23 18:49 ` [gentoo-dev] mtime preservation Denis Dupeyron
2009-11-23 20:39 ` Zac Medico
2009-11-23 23:19 ` Brian Harring
2009-11-24 14:26 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2009-11-24 22:21 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ciaran McCreesh
2009-11-26 1:28 ` Brian Harring
2009-11-26 12:41 ` David Leverton
2009-11-26 13:21 ` Brian Harring
2009-11-26 18:22 ` David Leverton
2009-11-26 15:15 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-11-25 21:13 ` [gentoo-dev] " Denis Dupeyron
2009-11-25 21:27 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-11-25 21:52 ` Duncan
2009-11-25 22:13 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-11-25 22:59 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ulrich Mueller
2009-11-26 0:15 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-11-26 0:49 ` Zac Medico
2009-11-26 1:14 ` Brian Harring
2009-11-26 5:26 ` Zac Medico
2009-11-26 5:33 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2009-11-26 5:35 ` [gentoo-dev] " Brian Harring
2009-11-26 5:30 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2009-11-26 12:35 ` [gentoo-dev] " David Leverton
2009-11-26 12:40 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2009-11-26 21:55 ` Zac Medico
2009-11-26 13:31 ` [gentoo-dev] " Brian Harring
2009-11-26 15:24 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-11-26 7:59 ` Ulrich Mueller
2009-11-26 9:07 ` Ulrich Mueller [this message]
2009-11-26 9:54 ` Łukasz Michalik
2009-11-26 11:47 ` Ulrich Mueller
2009-11-26 15:27 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-11-26 15:21 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-11-26 7:51 ` Ulrich Mueller
2009-11-26 5:07 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2009-11-26 5:04 ` Duncan
2009-11-28 20:57 ` Peter Hjalmarsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19214.17755.627908.131978@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de \
--to=ulm@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox